Intervention effectmodel-written summary

CCC increased Cleo grain yield by 10-15 kg grain/are.

A claim from Effects of 2-chloroethyl-trimethylammonium chloride (CCC) on yield and lodging of wheat. · 1967

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC increased Cleo grain yield by 10-15 kg grain/are.

Material
Cleoe1
Treatment
CCCt0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
10-15 kg grain/aree0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield increases obtained, 10-15 kg grain/are”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–627
t0

“Effects of 2-chloroethyl-trimethylammonium chloride (CCC) on yield and lodging of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88
e1

“winter wheat cv. Cleo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–386

Title

Effects of 2-chloroethyl-trimethylammonium chloride (CCC) on yield and lodging of wheat.

N.M. De Vos; K. Dilz; J. Bruinsma Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 1967. doi:10.18174/njas.v15i1.17452

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-bfe4f3357f6cd09d3831580a898353776e0e8bce59111eed722f442efc743125 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

chlormequat chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this claim · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    CCC increased mean grain yield by 5%.

    Effect of CCC (chlorocholine chloride) on growth and yield of spring wheat in the field · 1965

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Chlormequat and paclobutrazol did not affect wheat grain yield.

    Use of growth retardants in wheat · 2009

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    CCC did not affect yield.

    Response of Five Winter Wheat Cultivars to Growth Regulators and Increased Nitrogen1 · 1986

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Chlormequat left seed yields unchanged.

    EFFECTS OF CHLORMEQUAT ON PLANT HEIGHT, DISEASE DEVELOPMENT AND CHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF CULTIVARS OF BARLEY, OATS, AND WHEAT · 1977

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    CCC applied at ZGS 31-32 reduced wheat grain yield by 480 kg ha-1.

    Timing applications of growth regulators to alter spring cereal development at high latitudes · 2002

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    In the nonlodging year, CCC yield was similar to the check, at 6.60 versus 6.39 Mg ha −1.

    Growth and Yield of Winter Wheat as Influenced by Chlormequat Chloride and Ethephon · 1989 · compared with check

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Chlormequat did not significantly affect shoot number, crop dry weight, or grain yield in either cereal.

    A comparison of the root and shoot growth of winter barley and winter wheat, and the effect of an early application of chlormequat · 1984

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    On average the dwarfing compound CCC had no effect on spring wheat grain yields.

    Woburn irrigation, 1960–8:VI. Results for rotation crops · 1970

    Opposite direction

62 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.