Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ammonia volatilization with urea was 61.4 higher than with controlled-release urea in 2010–2011.

A claim from Suppression of Ammonia Volatilization from Rice–Wheat Rotation Fields Amended with Controlled‐Release Urea and Urea · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonia volatilization with urea was 61.4 higher than with controlled-release urea in 2010–2011.

Treatment
ureae0
Outcome
AVe0
Direction
highere0
Value
61.4e0
Comparator
CRUe0
Setting
2010–2011e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“AV applied with urea was 61.4 and 57.3% higher than that with CRU in 2010–2011 and 2011–2012”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–712
e1

“The AV applied with CRU and urea predominately occurred at the rice flooding period, which accounted for 83.2 to 86.6% and 95.5 to 96.9% of AV at the entire rice season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–896

Title

Suppression of Ammonia Volatilization from Rice–Wheat Rotation Fields Amended with Controlled‐Release Urea and Urea

Huihui Wang; Abeer M. Hegazy; Xia Jiang; et al. Agronomy Journal 2016. doi:10.2134/agronj2015.0295

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-c12e98e9c1c951ff20b87861b532457bf6f5983c086cf0224872c73481e94691 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

61 papers: 41 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.