Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Urea and controlled-release urea showed no obvious difference in grain yield, N concentration and removal N of aboveground biomass.

A claim from Suppression of Ammonia Volatilization from Rice–Wheat Rotation Fields Amended with Controlled‐Release Urea and Urea · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea and controlled-release urea showed no obvious difference in grain yield, N concentration and removal N of aboveground biomass.

Treatment
CRUe2
Outcome
grain yield, N concentration, and removal N of aboveground biomasse2
Direction
No obvious differencee2
Comparator
ureae2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The AV applied with CRU and urea predominately occurred at the rice flooding period, which accounted for 83.2 to 86.6% and 95.5 to 96.9% of AV at the entire rice season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–896
e2

“No obvious difference was observed between urea and CRU treatments concerning grain yield, N concentration, and removal N of aboveground biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1136

Title

Suppression of Ammonia Volatilization from Rice–Wheat Rotation Fields Amended with Controlled‐Release Urea and Urea

Huihui Wang; Abeer M. Hegazy; Xia Jiang; et al. Agronomy Journal 2016. doi:10.2134/agronj2015.0295

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-83040fef891ecc712806eee97730211d84c3961ca97a552e10b0b82a8af3455a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

271 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3,183 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3,446 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.