Claim · model-written summary
Dehydration produced no significant change in FNR activity.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- plant dehydratione0
- Gene
- FNRe0
- Outcome
- FNR activitye0
- Direction
- did not induce significant changese0
Not reportedMaterialCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The plant dehydration did not induce significant changes in FNR activity”
t0“wheat cultivars”
Title
M. K. Nikolaeva; S. N. Maevskaya; A. G. Shugaev; et al. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 2010. doi:10.1134/s1021443710010127
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Leaf water loss was slight during early water limitation in all cultivars.
- Intervention effect Leaf water content fell 5.2–6.8% after seven days of drought.
- Intervention effect Total chlorophyll increased insignificantly in the first two drought periods.
- Intervention effect Total chlorophyll later declined 13–15%.
- Observation The chlorophyll decline was not accompanied by a change in chlorophyll a/b ratio.
- Intervention effect GR and AscP activities increased in Ballada and Belchanka leaves on drought days three and five.
- Mechanism Lipid peroxidation stayed near the water-sufficient control level with coordinated GR and AscP increases.
- Intervention effect GR and AscP activities fell after seven days of dehydration.
- Intervention effect MDA content increased after seven days of dehydration.
- Intervention effect Beltskaya did not show the GR and AscP increases seen in the other cultivars.
- Intervention effect Beltskaya MDA content rose 16% only after seven days of drought.
- Intervention effect Proline content increased substantially during drought in all cultivars.