Paper · 2010 · Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

Effect of drought on chlorophyll content and antioxidant enzyme activities in leaves of three wheat cultivars varying in productivity

M. K. Nikolaeva; S. N. Maevskaya; A. G. Shugaev; et al.

13
claims
20
verbatim quotes
245
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Seedlings of three wheat varieties ( Triticum aestivum L.)—highly productive cv. Ballada, moderately productive cv. Belchanka, and low productive cv. Beltskaya—were exposed to progressive soil drought (cessation of watering for 3, 5, and 7 days) and then analyzed for chlorophyll content and activities of ferredoxin-NADP + oxidoreductase (FNR) and antioxidant enzymes, namely, glutathione reductase (GR) and ascorbate peroxidase (AscP). In addition, the proline content, and the extent of lipid peroxidation were examined. In the first period of water limitation, the water loss from leaves was slight for all wheat cultivars, which is characteristic of drought-resistant varieties. After 7-day drought the leaf water content decreased by 5.2–6.8%. The total chlorophyll content expressed per unit dry weight increased insignificantly during the first two periods of drought but decreased by 13–15% later on. This decrease was not accompanied by changes in chlorophyll a/b ratio. The plant dehydration did not induce significant changes in FNR activity. Activities of GR and AscP in leaves of wheat cultivars Ballada and Belchanka increased on the 3rd and 5th days of drought. Owing to the coordinated increase in GR and AscP activities, the lipid peroxidation rate remained at nearly the control level observed in water-sufficient plants. When the dehydration period was prolonged to 7 days, activities of GR and AscP in wheat cultivars reduced in parallel with the increase in malonic dialdehyde (MDA) content, indicating that the antioxidant enzyme defense system was weakened and lipid peroxidation enhanced. Unlike Ballada and Belchanka, the wheat cv. Beltskaya did not exhibit the increase in GR and AscP activities during progressive soil drought. The increase in MDA content by 16% in this cultivar was only observed after a 7-day drought period. The proline content in leaves of all wheat cultivars increased substantially during drought treatment. Thus, in wheat cultivars examined, different responses of the defense systems were mobilized to implement plant protection against water stress. The activities of antioxidant enzyme defense system depended on wheat cultivar, duration of drought, and the stage of leaf development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf water loss was slight during early water limitation in all cultivars.

Treatment
water limitatione0
Outcome
water loss from leavese0
Direction
slighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the first period of water limitation, the water loss from leaves was slight for all wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–626 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf water content fell 5.2–6.8% after seven days of drought.

Treatment
7-day droughte0
Outcome
leaf water contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
5.2–6.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 7-day drought the leaf water content decreased by 5.2–6.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll increased insignificantly in the first two drought periods.

Treatment
first two periods of droughte0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total chlorophyll content expressed per unit dry weight increased insignificantly during the first two periods of drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll later declined 13–15%.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
13–15%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total chlorophyll content expressed per unit dry weight increased insignificantly during the first two periods of drought but decreased by 13–15% later on”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The chlorophyll decline was not accompanied by a change in chlorophyll a/b ratio.

Outcome
chlorophyll a/b ratioe0
Direction
not accompanied by changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This decrease was not accompanied by changes in chlorophyll a/b ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dehydration produced no significant change in FNR activity.

Treatment
plant dehydratione0
Gene
FNRe0
Outcome
FNR activitye0
Direction
did not induce significant changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plant dehydration did not induce significant changes in FNR activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GR and AscP activities increased in Ballada and Belchanka leaves on drought days three and five.

Material
Ballada and Belchankae0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Activities of GR and AscPe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Activities of GR and AscP in leaves of wheat cultivars Ballada and Belchanka increased on the 3rd and 5th days of drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1176 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lipid peroxidation stayed near the water-sufficient control level with coordinated GR and AscP increases.

Gene
GR and AscPe0
Outcome
lipid peroxidation ratee0
Direction
remained at nearly the control levele0
Comparator
water-sufficient plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Owing to the coordinated increase in GR and AscP activities, the lipid peroxidation rate remained at nearly the control level observed in water-sufficient plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1339 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GR and AscP activities fell after seven days of dehydration.

Treatment
dehydration period was prolonged to 7 dayse0
Outcome
activities of GR and AscPe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the dehydration period was prolonged to 7 days, activities of GR and AscP in wheat cultivars reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1446 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MDA content increased after seven days of dehydration.

Treatment
dehydration period was prolonged to 7 dayse0
Outcome
malonic dialdehyde (MDA) contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the dehydration period was prolonged to 7 days, activities of GR and AscP in wheat cultivars reduced in parallel with the increase in malonic dialdehyde (MDA) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beltskaya did not show the GR and AscP increases seen in the other cultivars.

Material
Beltskayae0
Treatment
progressive soil droughte0
Outcome
GR and AscP activitiese0
Direction
did not exhibit the increasee0
Comparator
Ballada and Belchankae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Unlike Ballada and Belchanka, the wheat cv. Beltskaya did not exhibit the increase in GR and AscP activities during progressive soil drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1614–1754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beltskaya MDA content rose 16% only after seven days of drought.

Treatment
7-day drought periode0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
16%e0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in MDA content by 16% in this cultivar was only observed after a 7-day drought period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1854 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–109 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content increased substantially during drought in all cultivars.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
drought treatmente0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The proline content in leaves of all wheat cultivars increased substantially during drought treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1856–1957 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 48 positive, 27 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 49 positive, 30 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 56 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 16 positive, 115 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

206 papers: 60 positive, 146 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

202 papers more in this group

See all 206 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.