Paper · 2021 · The Journal Agriculture and Forestry

GERMINATION, SEEDLING GROWTH AND PHYSIO-BIOCHEMICAL INDICES OF BREAD WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.) GENOTYPES UNDER PEG INDUCED DROUGHT STRESS

Ece IYEM; Mehmet YILDIRIM; Ferhat KIZILGECI

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The establishment of seedlings at early growth stages of plants is one of the important determinants for higher yield potential under stress conditions.Therefore, high germination rate and vigorous seedling growth under water stress conditions is preferred to increase productivity.Considering this issue, an experiment was conducted to know the response of drought stress on the germination and seedling growth traits of available wheat cultivars.The study was carried out at the Laboratory of Horticulture in Agriculture Faculty, Cukurova University, Turkey.Seeds of five bread wheat genotypes viz.Wafia, Lucilla, Envoy, DZ19-2 and DZ19-1 were placed and grown in Petri-dishes under polyethylene glycol (PEG 6000) induced drought stresses of 0 (control=distilled water), -0.2, -0.4 and -0.6 MPa conditions for evaluation the properties of germination and seedling growth.Regarding the root length and dry weight, the genotypes Wafia, Lucilla and DZ19-1were found superior and seemed to be relatively tolerant to drought stress over other genotypes.Regarding biochemical analysis, the proline content increased with increasing drought levels, where the maximum proline was observed in the DZ19-1 genotype.Due to drought stress, the shoot proline content increased in drought-tolerant wheat genotypes whereas the proline level decreased in the sensitive ones compared to the control.Considering the study, the genotype DZ19-1 can be treated as drought tolerant genotype, and further investigations are needed, however, to support our understanding of the drought stress effects during the whole life cycle of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wafia, Lucilla and DZ19-1 had superior root length and dry weight under drought stress.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Wafia, Lucilla and DZ19-1e0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
root length and dry weighte0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
other genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regarding the root length and dry weight, the genotypes Wafia, Lucilla and DZ19-1were found superior and seemed to be relatively tolerant to drought stress over other genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1050 · show in text ↑
t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content increased with drought level.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing drought levelse0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the proline content increased with increasing drought levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DZ19-1 had the maximum proline content.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
DZ19-1e0
Outcome
maximum prolinee0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum proline was observed in the DZ19-1 genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased shoot proline in tolerant wheat genotypes versus control.

Material
drought-tolerant wheat genotypese0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
shoot proline contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to drought stress, the shoot proline content increased in drought-tolerant wheat genotypes whereas the proline level decreased in the sensitive ones compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1382 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress decreased proline in sensitive wheat genotypes versus control.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
the sensitive onese0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
proline levele0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to drought stress, the shoot proline content increased in drought-tolerant wheat genotypes whereas the proline level decreased in the sensitive ones compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered DZ19-1 drought tolerant.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
DZ19-1e0
Outcome
drought tolerant genotypee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the genotype DZ19-1 can be treated as drought tolerant genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1469 · show in text ↑
t0

“BREAD WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–74 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 48 positive, 27 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.