Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Deep tilled plot grain yield of maize was significantly higher by 4 than shallow tilled plot.

A claim from Organic carbon dynamics and changes in some physical properties of soil and their effect on grain yield of maize under conservative tillage practices in Abakaliki, Nigeria · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tilled plot grain yield of maize was significantly higher by 4 than shallow tilled plot.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
deep tilled plote2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
4e2
Comparator
shallowe2
Setting
Southeastern Nigeriae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An experiment was carried out using maize (Zea mays L.) to evaluate organic carbon dynamics and changes in some physical properties of soil and grain yield of maize under conservative tillage practices on an ultisol in Southeastern Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–502
e2

“Highest grain yield of maize, significantly higher by 4 and 20% was obtained in deep tilled plot when compared to yields in shallow and zero tilled plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–977

Title

Organic carbon dynamics and changes in some physical properties of soil and their effect on grain yield of maize under conservative tillage practices in Abakaliki, Nigeria

Nte Nwite James; Christopher Okolo Chukwuebuka African Journal of Agricultural Research 2017. doi:10.5897/ajar2017.12333

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-c151af30f11cbc1f558ca06d61ce2d386408130eafeaa25771184b403c230bb9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.