Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar Ascophyllum extract increased plant dry biomass by 52%.

A claim from Biostimulatory activities of Ascophyllum nodosum extract in tomato and sweet pepper crops in a tropical environment · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Ascophyllum extract increased plant dry biomass by 52%.

Taxon
tomato and sweet pepperCapsicum annuumSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
0.5% A. nodosum extract (AN) at 10-day intervalse0
Outcome
plant dry biomasse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
52%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications of 0.5% A. nodosum extract (AN) at 10-day intervals resulted in significant (P < 0.05) increase in plant growth parameters, including plant height (40%), leaf number (50%), plant dry biomass (52%), root length (59%) and chlorophyll content (20%) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–587
t0

“tomato and sweet pepper crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–89
e1

“This study evaluated the effectiveness of a commercially available Ascophyllum nodosum alkaline extract as a plant growth stimulant and defense elicitor against foliar diseases of tomato and sweet pepper caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria and Alternaria solani in a tropical environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–300

Title

Biostimulatory activities of Ascophyllum nodosum extract in tomato and sweet pepper crops in a tropical environment

Omar Ali; Adesh Ramsubhag; Jayaraj Jayaraman PLoS ONE 2019. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216710

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-c16b000fd788e7ae47ce45acd002fc2fc4d794fbc61d8439e8a9bcbfa6047910 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Ascophyllum nodosum · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Ascophyllum nodosum · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · growth · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 24 positive, 10 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.