Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T6 gave the maximum TSS (10.43) among treatments.

A claim from GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY NANOCHITOSAN AND BIOCAPSULES IN KINNOW MANDARIN (CITRUS RETICULATA) · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 gave the maximum TSS (10.43) among treatments.

Taxon
KINNOW MANDARIN (CITRUS RETICULATA)Citrus reticulatat0
Treatment
T6 NPK (RDF)+ Nanochitosan 100 ppm (soil drenching)+ Biocapsule 500 ppm (Soil drenching)e0
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
10.43e0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0
Setting
SHUATS, Prayagraj, UP, Indiae1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus reticulata
Citrus reticulata · TaxonJoe Ravi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among all the treatments T6 NPK (RDF)+ Nanochitosan 100 ppm (soil drenching)+ Biocapsule 500 ppm (Soil drenching) was observed best in the terms of yield parameters like maximum plant height (3.96m), Maximum number of flower per plant (166.26), Maximum number of fruit per plant (142.65), Maximum fruit diameter (7.89 cm), the maximum fruit weight (136.49 g), The maximum yield per plant (20.15 kg), Maximum fruit yield (53.72 t ha-1), and Qualitative parameters like Maximum TSS (10.43), Acidity% (1.08), Ascorbic acid (27.43 mg), Reducing sugar (3.73%), Non Reducing sugar (5.15%) and Total sugar (8.88%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–836
e1

“The present study was carried out in the Research field of the Department of Horticulture, SHUATS, Prayagraj, UP, India.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–120
t0

“KINNOW MANDARIN (CITRUS RETICULATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–108

Title

GROWTH, YIELD AND QUALITY AS AFFECTED BY NANOCHITOSAN AND BIOCAPSULES IN KINNOW MANDARIN (CITRUS RETICULATA)

RAJVEER GURJAR; SAKET MISHRA; VIJAY BAHADUR; et al. Asian Journal of Microbiology Biotechnology and Environmental Sciences 2022. doi:10.53550/ajmbes.2022.v24i04.007

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-c1962000cb3d3059e19684cf0aca483ba52d38a7ea59ceae71aa070fb274af63 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Citrus reticulata (tangerine)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.