Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Grazing the two wheat varieties at the high rainfall location increased livestock enterprise profitability 2.5 times more than grazing crops at both low rainfall locations (modelled).

A claim from Grazing winter and spring wheat crops improves the profitability of prime lamb production in mixed farming systems of Western Australia · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)simulated

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing the two wheat varieties at the high rainfall location increased livestock enterprise profitability 2.5 times more than grazing crops at both low rainfall locations (modelled).

Material
dual-purpose winter and springe1
Treatment
grazing the two wheat varietiese1
Outcome
profitability of the livestock enterprisee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
2.5 times moree1
Comparator
grazing crops at both low rainfall locationse1
Setting
high rainfall locatione1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“grazing the two wheat varieties (dual-purpose winter and spring) at the high rainfall location increased the profitability of the livestock enterprise by 2.5 times more than grazing crops at both low rainfall locations (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–1084

Title

Grazing winter and spring wheat crops improves the profitability of prime lamb production in mixed farming systems of Western Australia

E. Hussein; D. T. Thomas; L. W. Bell; et al. Animal Production Science 2016. doi:10.1071/an15850

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-c1966831fcace021a0572a4971fba43b11a61c3a5e0d1b119864ddfa2e2e3544 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

grazing · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

70 papers: 34 positive, 36 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this claim · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.