Intervention effectmodel-written summary

IBA improved overall rooting and usable rooting numbers in early-pruned Salt Creek and Dog Ridge.

A claim from Grapevine Propagation. Xi. Rooting of Cuttings: Effects of Indolebutyric Acid (Iba) and Refrigeration on Rooting · 1979

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA improved overall rooting and usable rooting numbers in early-pruned Salt Creek and Dog Ridge.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Material
Salt Creek and Dog Ridgee0
Treatment
indolebutyric acid (IBA)e0
Outcome
overall rooting and the numbers of usable rootingse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
early-pruned vinese0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indolebutyric acid (IBA) improved the overall rooting and the numbers of usable rootings of cuttings of early-pruned vines of Salt Creek and Dog Ridge.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 34–185
t0

“Grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9

Title

Grapevine Propagation. Xi. Rooting of Cuttings: Effects of Indolebutyric Acid (Iba) and Refrigeration on Rooting

C. J. Alley American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 1979. doi:10.5344/ajev.1979.30.1.28

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-c2c8fa59f61c77b598401cf8030aae98d62dd525d8262544b02aaf9b112fb631 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · VitisResults differ

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.