Claim · model-written summary
In-crop glyphosate produced higher net revenues than other treatments.
- Taxon
- canola
.jpg?width=60)
Brassica napus var. napust0 - Treatment
- in-crop glyphosate applicationse0
- Outcome
- net revenuese0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The in-crop glyphosate applications resulted in higher net revenues than the other treatments.”
t0“Canola”
Title
John T. O'Donovan; K. Neil Harker; George W. Clayton; et al. Weed Technology 2006. doi:10.1614/wt-05-092r.1
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Preseeding spring glyphosate improved weed control over fall 2,4-D.
- Intervention effect Preseeding spring glyphosate reduced dockage relative to fall 2,4-D.
- Intervention effect Preseeding spring glyphosate increased canola yield and net return relative to fall 2,4-D.
- Intervention effect One or two in-crop glyphosate applications gave similar weed control, dockage and canola yield to the full traditional regime.
- Intervention effect In-crop glyphosate gave superior weed control and canola yield to the simpler traditional regimes.
- Intervention effect In-crop glyphosate reduced dockage versus the simpler traditional regimes.
- Intervention effect A second in-crop glyphosate application offered little or no advantage over one.
- Intervention effect The glyphosate system used less herbicide active ingredient than most traditional regimes, especially with one application.