Intervention effectmodel-written summary

One or two in-crop glyphosate applications gave similar weed control, dockage and canola yield to the full traditional regime.

A claim from Comparison of a Glyphosate-Resistant Canola (Brassica napusL.) System with Traditional Herbicide Regimes · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One or two in-crop glyphosate applications gave similar weed control, dockage and canola yield to the full traditional regime.

Treatment
Glyphosate applied once (two- to four-leaf canola) or twice (two- to four-leaf followed by five- to six-leaf canola) in-crope0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control, dockage, and canola yielde0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
ethalfluralin applied PRE in the fall followed by an in-crop mixture of sethoxydim, ethametsulfuron, and clopyralide0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate applied once (two- to four-leaf canola) or twice (two- to four-leaf followed by five- to six-leaf canola) in-crop provided similar weed control, dockage, and canola yield as ethalfluralin applied PRE in the fall followed by an in-crop mixture of sethoxydim, ethametsulfuron, and clopyralid; and superior weed control and canola yield and lower dockage than ethalfluralin alone or an in-crop mixture of sethoxydim and ethametsulfuron.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–892

Title

Comparison of a Glyphosate-Resistant Canola (Brassica napusL.) System with Traditional Herbicide Regimes

John T. O'Donovan; K. Neil Harker; George W. Clayton; et al. Weed Technology 2006. doi:10.1614/wt-05-092r.1

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-3672f187b6de8d4a1cf12a76016594fcaf25de5b782cbec920e461dcba174f4c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Brassica napus var. napus · weed · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
See all 7 papers →

glyphosate · weed · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.