Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cutting frequency did not significantly affect vegetative composition.

A claim from [Regrowth of different plant populations in mixed pasture]. · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting frequency did not significantly affect vegetative composition.

Taxon
perennial ryegrass and white cloverTrifolium repensLolium perennee1
Treatment
cutting frequencye0
Outcome
vegetative compositione0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium repens
Trifolium repens · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium perenne
Lolium perenne · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cutting frequency had no significant effects on herbage yields and vegetative composition (P > 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–810
e1

“perennial ryegrass and white clover in the mixed pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–555

Title

[Regrowth of different plant populations in mixed pasture].

Yingwen Yu; Wenlan Jiang; Fanjun Ran; et al. PubMed 2002

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-c3130862d2c8293f9e7009f504cb37864d36495c3cbf40892f0e103f4424fc3b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

pruning · quality: general · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

pruning · quality: general · Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.