Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing nutrients significantly increased siliquae, seeds per siliqua and seed weight.

A claim from Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield, quality and nutrient uptake of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in arid zone of Rajasthan · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nutrients significantly increased siliquae, seeds per siliqua and seed weight.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceat0
Treatment
80 kg N + 40 Kg P O /hae0
Outcome
siliquae/plant, seeds/siliqua, 1,000-seed weighte0
Direction
in- creasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, dry matter accumulation, chlorophyll content, siliquae/plant, seeds/siliqua, 1,000-seed weight, seed and stover yield, nutrient uptake, oil content and oil yield in- creased significantly up to 80 kg N + 40 Kg P O /ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–966
t0

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–122

Title

Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth, yield, quality and nutrient uptake of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) in arid zone of Rajasthan

AMIT KUMAWAT; B.L. PAREEK; R.S. YADAV; et al. Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v59i1.4516

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-c6d6d9a787ddc811e2c1048097f207efbaadffceb7ee4fb29d487d8a1d1a3daa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Results differ

65 papers: 63 positive, 2 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.