Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fruit of transplants had total soluble solids more than 2 per cent higher than field seeded plants started on the same date.

A claim from Effects of Field Seeding and Transplanting on Earliness, Quality, and Yield of Cantaloupe Varieties · 1968

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit of transplants had total soluble solids more than 2 per cent higher than field seeded plants started on the same date.

Treatment
transplantse2
Outcome
total soluble solids content of fruite2
Direction
highere2
Value
more than 2 per cente2
Comparator
field seeded plants started the same datee2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three-week old plants of 10 cantaloupe varieties grown in 3-inch peat pots were transplanted to the field from April 15 to 24 for a S-year period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–154
e2

“The total soluble solids content of fruit from transplants averaged more than 2 per cent higher than that of field seeded plants started the same date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–487

Title

Effects of Field Seeding and Transplanting on Earliness, Quality, and Yield of Cantaloupe Varieties

J. D. Norton HortScience 1968. doi:10.21273/hortsci.3.3.175

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-c74a4bbac2be68418784bd62c5063c3e36deb2c3cf90e069ff7f85289ba61c41 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

transplanting · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.