Paper · 1968 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Effects of Field Seeding and Transplanting on Earliness, Quality, and Yield of Cantaloupe Varieties

J. D. Norton

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Three-week old plants of 10 cantaloupe varieties grown in 3-inch peat pots were transplanted to the field from April 15 to 24 for a S-year period. Field seeded plots were direct seeded the same day and 7-10 days earlier. The yield and fruit weight from transplants were significantly higher than those from field seeded plants. The total soluble solids content of fruit from transplants averaged more than 2 per cent higher than that of field seeded plants started the same date. When field seeded 7-10 days earlier, the difference was not as great; however, total soluble solids were consisently higher in fruit from transplants. Two factors were possibly responsible for the higher yields, fruit weights, and soluble solids. Because field seeded plants matured later, foliar diseases were more severe and plants were also exposed to additional cloudiness and rainfall. Fruit of transplants matured approximately 14 days earlier than that of field seeded plants started the same date. When field seeding was accomplished 7-10 days before transplanting, fruit from field seeded plants matured only 7-10 days after the transplants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplants had significantly higher yield than field seeded plants.

Treatment
transplantse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
field seeded plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield and fruit weight from transplants were significantly higher than those from field seeded plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–335 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cantaloupe Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplants had significantly higher fruit weight than field seeded plants.

Treatment
transplantse0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
field seeded plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield and fruit weight from transplants were significantly higher than those from field seeded plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–335 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cantaloupe Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplant fruit had over 2 per cent higher soluble solids than same-date seeding.

Treatment
transplantse0
Outcome
total soluble solids contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
more than 2 per cente0
Comparator
field seeded plants started the same datee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total soluble solids content of fruit from transplants averaged more than 2 per cent higher than that of field seeded plants started the same date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cantaloupe Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplant fruit had consistently higher solids even when field seeding was earlier.

Treatment
transplantse0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
field seeded 7-10 days earliere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When field seeded 7-10 days earlier, the difference was not as great; however, total soluble solids were consisently higher in fruit from transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cantaloupe Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplant fruit matured approximately 14 days earlier than same-date seeded fruit.

Treatment
transplantse0
Outcome
maturede0
Direction
earliere0
Value
approximately 14 dayse0
Comparator
field seeded plants started the same datee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit of transplants matured approximately 14 days earlier than that of field seeded plants started the same date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cantaloupe Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier field seeding yielded fruit 7-10 days after transplanting.

Treatment
field seedinge0
Outcome
maturede0
Direction
aftere0
Value
7-10 dayse0
Comparator
transplantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When field seeding was accomplished 7-10 days before transplanting, fruit from field seeded plants matured only 7-10 days after the transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1138 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cantaloupe Varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–99 · show in text ↑

transplanting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

transplanting · quality: sugar starch · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.