Paper · 2002 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Root Dynamics of Muskmelon Transplants as Affected by Nursery Irrigation

José A. Franco; Daniel I. Leskovar

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Containerized `Lavi' muskmelon [ Cucumis melo L. (Reticulatus Group)] transplants were grown in a nursery with two irrigation systems: overhead irrigation (OI) and flotation irrigation (FI). Initially, root development was monitored during a 36-day nursery period. Thereafter, seedling root growth was monitored either in transparent containers inside a growth chamber, or through minirhizotrons placed in the field. During the nursery period, OI promoted increased early basal root growth, whereas FI promoted greater basal root elongation between 25 and 36 days after seeding (DAS). At 36 DAS leaf area, shoot fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW), and shoot to root ratio were greater for OI than for FI transplants, while root length and FWs and DWs were nearly the same. Total root elongation in the growth chamber was greater for FI than for OI transplants between 4 and 14 days after transplanting. Similarly, the minirhizotron measurements in the field showed a greater root length density in the uppermost layer of the soil profile for FI than for OI transplants. Overall, muskmelon transplants had greater root development initially when subjected to overhead compared to flotation irrigation in the nursery. However, during late development FI transplants appeared to have a greater capacity to regenerate roots, thus providing an adaptive mechanism to enhance postplanting root development and to withstand transplant shock in field conditions. At harvest, root length density and yield were closely similar for the plants in the two transplant irrigation treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overhead irrigation increased early basal root growth.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
OIe0
Outcome
early basal root growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“OI promoted increased early basal root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–489 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flotation irrigation increased basal root elongation at 25–36 DAS.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
FIe0
Outcome
basal root elongatione0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
between 25 and 36 days after seeding (DAS)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FI promoted greater basal root elongation between 25 and 36 days after seeding (DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 36 DAS, overhead irrigation gave greater leaf area, shoot fresh and dry weight, and shoot to root ratio.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
OIe0
Outcome
leaf area, shoot fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW), and shoot to root ratioe0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
At 36 DASe0
Comparator
FIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 36 DAS leaf area, shoot fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW), and shoot to root ratio were greater for OI than for FI transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 36 DAS, root length and root fresh and dry weights were nearly the same between treatments.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Outcome
root length and FWs and DWse0
Direction
nearly the samee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while root length and FWs and DWs were nearly the same”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FI transplants had greater total root elongation in the growth chamber 4–14 days after transplanting.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
FIe0
Outcome
Total root elongatione0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
between 4 and 14 days after transplantinge0
Comparator
OIe0
Setting
growth chambere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total root elongation in the growth chamber was greater for FI than for OI transplants between 4 and 14 days after transplanting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FI transplants had greater upper soil root length density in the field.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
FIe0
Outcome
root length densitye0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
uppermost layer of the soil profilee0
Comparator
OIe0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the minirhizotron measurements in the field showed a greater root length density in the uppermost layer of the soil profile for FI than for OI transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest root length density and yield were closely similar across irrigation treatments.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
two transplant irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
root length density and yielde0
Direction
closely similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At harvest, root length density and yield were closely similar for the plants in the two transplant irrigation treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–38 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

57 papers: 37 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

transplanting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

irrigation · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 13 positive, 9 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.