Paper · 2018 · Photosynthetica

Genotypic differences in leaf gas exchange and growth responses to deficit irrigation in reticulatus and inodorus melons (Cucumis melo L.)

S.P. SHARMA; D.I. LESKOVAR; K.M. CROSBY

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Leaf gas exchange and growth responses of three melon cultivars, i.e., Mission, Da Vinci (var. reticulatus), and Super Nectar (var. inodorus) to two irrigation regimes, 50 and 100% crop evapotranspiration (ETc) were investigated under water-limited conditions of southwest Texas. In 2012, deficit irrigation (50% ETc) significantly decreased above-ground biomass, leaf area, leaf number, and specific leaf area, while leaf gas exchange, relative water content, water potential, chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm), and chlorophyll content (SPAD index) were not affected. However, in the drier year 2011, deficit irrigation significantly reduced net photosynthetic rate (PN) and stomatal conductance (gs). Further, the responses to water deficit varied with cultivars. At 50% ETc, PN and gs were maintained in cv. Da Vinci while decreased in Mission and Super Nectar. Thus, the late maturing cv. Super Nectar appeared to be more sensitive to drought stress, possibly due to the decrease in leaf area and PN.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012, deficit irrigation significantly decreased above-ground biomass.

Taxon
Cucumis melo L.Cucumis melot0
Treatment
deficit irrigation (50% ETc)e0
Outcome
above-ground biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
In 2012e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumis melo L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“In 2012, deficit irrigation (50% ETc) significantly decreased above-ground biomass, leaf area, leaf number, and specific leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012, deficit irrigation significantly decreased leaf area, leaf number and specific leaf area.

Taxon
Cucumis melo L.Cucumis melot0
Treatment
deficit irrigation (50% ETc)e0
Outcome
leaf area, leaf number, and specific leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
In 2012e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumis melo L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“In 2012, deficit irrigation (50% ETc) significantly decreased above-ground biomass, leaf area, leaf number, and specific leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012, leaf gas exchange was not affected by deficit irrigation.

Taxon
Cucumis melo L.Cucumis melot0
Outcome
leaf gas exchangee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumis melo L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf gas exchange, relative water content, water potential, chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm), and chlorophyll content (SPAD index) were not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012, relative water content and water potential were not affected.

Taxon
Cucumis melo L.Cucumis melot0
Outcome
relative water content, water potentiale0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumis melo L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf gas exchange, relative water content, water potential, chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm), and chlorophyll content (SPAD index) were not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2012, chlorophyll fluorescence and chlorophyll content were not affected.

Taxon
Cucumis melo L.Cucumis melot0
Outcome
chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm), and chlorophyll content (SPAD index)e0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumis melo L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf gas exchange, relative water content, water potential, chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm), and chlorophyll content (SPAD index) were not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2011, deficit irrigation significantly reduced net photosynthetic rate.

Taxon
Cucumis melo L.Cucumis melot0
Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate (PN)e0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
drier year 2011e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumis melo L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“in the drier year 2011, deficit irrigation significantly reduced net photosynthetic rate (PN) and stomatal conductance (gs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2011, deficit irrigation significantly reduced stomatal conductance.

Taxon
Cucumis melo L.Cucumis melot0
Treatment
deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
stomatal conductance (gs)e0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
drier year 2011e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumis melo L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“in the drier year 2011, deficit irrigation significantly reduced net photosynthetic rate (PN) and stomatal conductance (gs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–700 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50% ETc, Da Vinci maintained PN and gs.

Taxon
Cucumis melo L.Cucumis melot0
Material
cv. Da Vincie0
Treatment
50% ETce0
Outcome
PN and gse0
Direction
maintainede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumis melo L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 50% ETc, PN and gs were maintained in cv. Da Vinci while decreased in Mission and Super Nectar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–862 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50% ETc, Mission had decreased PN and gs.

Taxon
Cucumis melo L.Cucumis melot0
Material
Missione0
Treatment
50% ETce0
Outcome
PN and gse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumis melo L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 50% ETc, PN and gs were maintained in cv. Da Vinci while decreased in Mission and Super Nectar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–862 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50% ETc, Super Nectar had decreased PN and gs.

Taxon
Cucumis melo L.Cucumis melot0
Material
Super Nectare0
Treatment
50% ETce0
Outcome
PN and gse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumis melo L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“At 50% ETc, PN and gs were maintained in cv. Da Vinci while decreased in Mission and Super Nectar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–862 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super Nectar appeared more drought sensitive, possibly due to decreased leaf area and PN.

Taxon
Cucumis melo L.Cucumis melot0
Material
cv. Super Nectare0
Outcome
more sensitive to drought stresse0
Qualifier
possibly due to the decrease in leaf area and PNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumis melo L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“the late maturing cv. Super Nectar appeared to be more sensitive to drought stress, possibly due to the decrease in leaf area and PN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1002 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 13 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

irrigation · physiology: gas exchange · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.