Claim · model-written summary
BAP inhibited rooting of grapevine cuttings completely.
- Organ / stage
- Hardwood Cuttingst0
- Treatment
- BAPe0
- Outcome
- rooting of grapevine cuttingse0
- Direction
- suppressede0
VitisNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“BAP suppressed rooting of grapevine cuttings completely, whereas GA3 and ABA inhibited it temporarily.”
t0“Grapevine Hardwood Cuttings”
Title
Yoshitaka Kawai Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 1997. doi:10.2503/jjshs.66.93
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect GA3 inhibited rooting of grapevine cuttings temporarily.
- Intervention effect ABA inhibited rooting of grapevine cuttings temporarily.
- Intervention effect BAP increased endogenous IAA per cutting 12.6 times over control.
- Intervention effect BAP increased endogenous IAA per gram fresh weight 19.4 times over control.
- Intervention effect GA3 treated cuttings had higher diffusible IAA than controls throughout the experiment.
- Intervention effect GA3 treated cuttings had a similar extractable IAA fluctuation pattern to controls.
- Intervention effect ABA lowered extractable IAA at 10 days after planting.
- Intervention effect BAP produced a different endogenous IAA fluctuation pattern from GA3 and ABA.
- Mechanism Authors propose that unbalanced endogenous IAA explains failure of BAP treated cuttings to root.
- Mechanism Authors propose direct GA3 inhibition of root formation.
- Mechanism Authors propose ABA inhibits rooting by depressing bud activity.