Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spring NPK and AN increased yield, less than autumn application.

A claim from PRINOS SOJE U ZAVISNOSTI OD VREMENA PRIMENE NPK ĐUBRIVA · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring NPK and AN increased yield, less than autumn application.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Spring application of NPK fertilizers and ANe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
autumn applicatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring application of NPK fertilizers and AN increases the yield, but the effect of fertilizers is significantly less compared to autumn application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–562
e1

“The aim of this research is to examine the impact of NPK fertilizer application in the autumn and spring period on the level of soybean yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–257

Title

PRINOS SOJE U ZAVISNOSTI OD VREMENA PRIMENE NPK ĐUBRIVA

Vojin Đukic; Jegor Miladinovic; Zlatica Miladinov Mamlic; et al. Zbornik radova 2021. doi:10.46793/sbt26.043dj

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-c8fecfc6d1eec2865b90961ef636e6f1a321e2aa12725727910c94cbae4d83ca · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

1,192 papers: 1,021 positive, 171 negative or no effect

1,020 papers in the same direction as this claim · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

1,183 papers more in this group

See all 1,192 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.