Paper · 1978 · Agronomy Journal

Effect of Foliar Fertilization on Photosynthesis, Leaf Nutrition, and Yield of Soybeans1

K. J. Boote; R. N. Gallaher; W. K. Robertson; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
106
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Foliar fertilization (FF) was reported to increase seed yields of soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in field experiments in Iowa, but yield increases were not consistent. The researchers hypothesized that FF should minimize nutrient depletion from leaves during seed development, and thereby delay the resulting decrease in leaf photosynthesis. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a field experiment in 1976 to determine the effect of FF on leaf element concentrations, gross leaf photosynthesis (Pg), and soybean seed yield. Five weekly foliar sprays were applied during the seed‐filling period of ‘Bragg’ soybean grown at Gainesville, Florida on Kendrick loamy sand (loamy, siliceous, hyperthermic grossarenic paleudult). At weekly intervals, we sampled upper leaves and total canopy leaves and analyzed them for N, P, and K, and measured Pg of upper leaves in mid‐day sun with a 14 CO 2 gas flow technique. Foliar applications of N, P, K, and S increased the N, P, and K concentration of total canopy leaves from 3.28, 0.24, and 0.92% to 3.48, 0.29, and 1.32%, respectively. FF significantly increased upper leaf Pg only at two late sample dates when seed growth was nearly complete and most leaves had already senesced and dropped. Even though nutrient concentrations were increased, FF did not significantly affect yields nor did it extend Pg duration or delay maturity. Treated soybeans yielded 3617 kg/ha compared to 3825 kg/ha for control soybeans. Leaf Pg and concentrations of N and P in leaves progressively decreased during seed‐filling until maturity but K did not decline. Leaf Pg was positively correlated with N (r = 0.87) and approached zero at approximately 1.75% N, a concentration similar to that of senesced, recently abscised leaves. Maximum Pg was predicted at 4.6 to 6.0% leaf N. Leaf Pg and percent P were also positively correlated. The relationship of Pg to leaf N during N removal from leaves can potentially be used to model photosynthetic decline during seed‐filling.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilization increased canopy leaf N concentration from 3.28 to 3.48%.

Taxon
SoybeansGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Foliar applications of N, P, K, and Se0
Outcome
N, P, and K concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.48e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications of N, P, K, and S increased the N, P, and K concentration of total canopy leaves from 3.28, 0.24, and 0.92% to 3.48, 0.29, and 1.32%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilization increased canopy leaf P concentration from 0.24 to 0.29%.

Taxon
SoybeansGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Foliar applications of N, P, K, and Se0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.29e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications of N, P, K, and S increased the N, P, and K concentration of total canopy leaves from 3.28, 0.24, and 0.92% to 3.48, 0.29, and 1.32%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilization increased canopy leaf K concentration from 0.92 to 1.32%.

Taxon
SoybeansGlycine maxt0
Treatment
Foliar applications of N, P, K, and Se0
Outcome
K concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.32%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar applications of N, P, K, and S increased the N, P, and K concentration of total canopy leaves from 3.28, 0.24, and 0.92% to 3.48, 0.29, and 1.32%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilization significantly increased upper leaf photosynthesis only on two late sample dates.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
FFe0
Outcome
upper leaf Pge0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
two late sample datese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FF significantly increased upper leaf Pg only at two late sample dates when seed growth was nearly complete and most leaves had already senesced and dropped.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilization did not significantly affect seed yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
FFe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even though nutrient concentrations were increased, FF did not significantly affect yields nor did it extend Pg duration or delay maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilization did not extend photosynthesis duration.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
FFe0
Outcome
Pg duratione0
Direction
nor did it extende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even though nutrient concentrations were increased, FF did not significantly affect yields nor did it extend Pg duration or delay maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilization did not delay maturity.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
FFe0
Outcome
maturitye0
Direction
delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even though nutrient concentrations were increased, FF did not significantly affect yields nor did it extend Pg duration or delay maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated soybean yielded 3617 kg/ha versus 3825 kg/ha in controls.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe0
Outcome
yieldede0
Value
3617 kg/hae0
Qualifier
3825 kg/hae0
Comparator
control soybeanse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treated soybeans yielded 3617 kg/ha compared to 3825 kg/ha for control soybeans.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1467 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf photosynthesis and leaf N and P concentrations decreased through seed filling to maturity.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
Leaf Pg and concentrations of N and P in leavese0
Direction
progressively decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf Pg and concentrations of N and P in leaves progressively decreased during seed‐filling until maturity but K did not decline.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf K did not decline during seed filling.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
did not declinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf Pg and concentrations of N and P in leaves progressively decreased during seed‐filling until maturity but K did not decline.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf photosynthesis correlated positively with leaf N.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
Leaf Pge0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Value
r = 0.87e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf Pg was positively correlated with N (r = 0.87) and approached zero at approximately 1.75% N, a concentration similar to that of senesced, recently abscised leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1766 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf photosynthesis approached zero at about 1.75% N.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
Leaf Pge0
Direction
approached zeroe0
Value
1.75% Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf Pg was positively correlated with N (r = 0.87) and approached zero at approximately 1.75% N, a concentration similar to that of senesced, recently abscised leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1766 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum leaf photosynthesis was predicted at 4.6 to 6.0% leaf N.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
Pge0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
4.6 to 6.0% leaf Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum Pg was predicted at 4.6 to 6.0% leaf N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf photosynthesis and leaf P percentage correlated positively.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
Leafe0
Outcome
Leaf Pge0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf Pg and percent P were also positively correlated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1815–1869 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose using the leaf photosynthesis–N relationship to model decline during seed filling.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
model photosynthetic decline during seed‐fillinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship of Pg to leaf N during N removal from leaves can potentially be used to model photosynthetic decline during seed‐filling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–2008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–87 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

94 papers: 73 positive, 21 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

application · phenology · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · phenology · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 27 positive, 9 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 62 positive, 11 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 107 positive, 17 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

404 papers: 332 positive, 72 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 332 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

400 papers more in this group

See all 404 papers →

fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

1,192 papers: 1,021 positive, 171 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,021 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,188 papers more in this group

See all 1,192 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.