Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Leaf length, leaf width and crown diameter did not differ significantly across GA 3 methods or doses.

A claim from Gibberellin Application Method and Concentration Affect to Growth, Runner, and Daughter Plant Production in ‘Maehyang’ Strawberry during Nursery Period · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf length, leaf width and crown diameter did not differ significantly across GA 3 methods or doses.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
application method and concentration of GA 3e0
Outcome
leaf length, leaf width, and crown diametere0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf length, leaf width, and crown diameter showed no significant differences in all treatment among application method and concentration of GA 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1278
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–129

Title

Gibberellin Application Method and Concentration Affect to Growth, Runner, and Daughter Plant Production in ‘Maehyang’ Strawberry during Nursery Period

Jae Hyeon Kang; Hyeon Min Kim; Hye Min Kim; et al. Protected horticulture and Plant Factory 2018. doi:10.12791/ksbec.2018.27.4.407

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-c9918ff1307ef1dedb61345284f06b7188a886ad268d8405a245d335307c4ab0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Gibberellic acid · growth · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results differ

37 papers: 33 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.