Intervention effectmodel-written summary

DK 8031 under glyphosate had the highest grain yield among the tillage practices involved.

A claim from Comparative Efficiency of Tillage Practices in Maize · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DK 8031 under glyphosate had the highest grain yield among the tillage practices involved.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
DK 8031e5
Treatment
glyphosatee5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
higheste5
Comparator
the tillage practices involvede5
Setting
Kigumo districte1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weed management in maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–265
e1

“The trials were executed in Kigumo district”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 84–127
e5

“DK 8031 under glyphosate had the highest yield among the tillage practices involved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1300

Title

Comparative Efficiency of Tillage Practices in Maize

B Ita; E Ariga; R Michieka; et al. Current Agriculture Research Journal 2014. doi:10.12944/carj.2.2.04

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-c9dc4d4e6077ab944b110b7fa873de9e5e1f338d6895f94773e35f7dd9c60c3b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

68 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.