Paper · 2010 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Glyphosate Effect on Shikimate, Nitrate Reductase Activity, Yield, and Seed Composition in Corn

Krishna N. Reddy; Nacer Bellaloui; Robert M. Zablotowicz

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
48
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

When glyphosate is applied to glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops, drift to nonglyphosate-resistant (non-GR) crops may cause significant injury and reduce yields. Tools are needed to quantify injury and predict crop losses. In this study, glyphosate drift was simulated by direct application at 12.5% of the recommended label rate to non-GR corn (Zea mays L.) at 3 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP) during two field seasons in the Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USA. Visual plant injury, shikimate accumulation, nitrate reductase activity, leaf nitrogen, yield, and seed composition were evaluated. Effects were also evaluated in GR corn and GR corn with stacked glufosinate-resistant gene at the recommended label rate at 3 and 6 WAP. Glyphosate at 105 g ae/ha was applied once at 3 or 6 weeks after planting to non-GR corn. Glyphosate at 840 (lower label limit) or 1260 (upper label limit) g ae/ha was applied twice at 3 and 6 WAP to transgenic corn. Glyphosate caused injury (45-55%) and increased shikimate levels (24-86%) in non-GR compared to nontreated corn. In non-GR corn, glyphosate drift did not affect starch content but increased seed protein 8-21% while reducing leaf nitrogen reductase activity 46-64%, leaf nitrogen 7-16%, grain yield 49-54%, and seed oil 18-23%. In GR and GR stacked with glufosinate-resistant corn, glyphosate applied at label rates did not affect corn yield, leaf and seed nitrogen, or seed composition (protein, oil, and starch content). Yet, nitrate reductase activity was reduced 5-19% with glyphosate at 840 + 840 g/ha rate and 8-42% with glyphosate at 1260 + 1260 g/ha rate in both GR and GR stacked corn. These results demonstrate the potential for severe yield loss in non-GR corn exposed to glyphosate drift.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated glyphosate drift caused about 45-55% injury in non-GR corn compared with nontreated corn.

Material
non-GRe2
Treatment
glyphosate drifte1
Outcome
injurye2
Direction
increaseinferrede2
Value
45-55%e2
Comparator
nontreated corne2
Setting
Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USAe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“glyphosate drift was simulated by direct application at 12.5% of the recommended label rate to non-GR corn (Zea mays L.) at 3 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP) during two field seasons in the Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–473 · show in text ↑
e2

“Glyphosate caused injury (45-55%) and increased shikimate levels (24-86%) in non-GR compared to nontreated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated glyphosate drift increased shikimate levels by 24-86% in non-GR corn compared with nontreated corn.

Material
non-GRe2
Treatment
glyphosate drifte1
Outcome
shikimate levelse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
24-86%e2
Comparator
nontreated corne2
Setting
Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USAe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“glyphosate drift was simulated by direct application at 12.5% of the recommended label rate to non-GR corn (Zea mays L.) at 3 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP) during two field seasons in the Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–473 · show in text ↑
e2

“Glyphosate caused injury (45-55%) and increased shikimate levels (24-86%) in non-GR compared to nontreated corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated glyphosate drift did not affect starch content of non-GR corn seed.

Material
non-GRe3
Treatment
glyphosate drifte3
Outcome
starch contente3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Setting
Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USAe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“glyphosate drift was simulated by direct application at 12.5% of the recommended label rate to non-GR corn (Zea mays L.) at 3 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP) during two field seasons in the Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–473 · show in text ↑
e3

“In non-GR corn, glyphosate drift did not affect starch content but increased seed protein 8-21% while reducing leaf nitrogen reductase activity 46-64%, leaf nitrogen 7-16%, grain yield 49-54%, and seed oil 18-23%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated glyphosate drift increased seed protein by 8-21% in non-GR corn.

Material
non-GRe3
Treatment
glyphosate drifte3
Outcome
seed proteine3
Direction
increasede3
Value
8-21%e3
Setting
Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USAe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“glyphosate drift was simulated by direct application at 12.5% of the recommended label rate to non-GR corn (Zea mays L.) at 3 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP) during two field seasons in the Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–473 · show in text ↑
e3

“In non-GR corn, glyphosate drift did not affect starch content but increased seed protein 8-21% while reducing leaf nitrogen reductase activity 46-64%, leaf nitrogen 7-16%, grain yield 49-54%, and seed oil 18-23%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated glyphosate drift reduced leaf nitrate reductase activity by 46-64% in non-GR corn.

Material
non-GRe3
Treatment
glyphosate drifte3
Outcome
leaf nitrogen reductase activitye3
Direction
reducinge3
Value
46-64%e3
Setting
Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USAe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“glyphosate drift was simulated by direct application at 12.5% of the recommended label rate to non-GR corn (Zea mays L.) at 3 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP) during two field seasons in the Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–473 · show in text ↑
e3

“In non-GR corn, glyphosate drift did not affect starch content but increased seed protein 8-21% while reducing leaf nitrogen reductase activity 46-64%, leaf nitrogen 7-16%, grain yield 49-54%, and seed oil 18-23%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated glyphosate drift reduced leaf nitrogen by 7-16% in non-GR corn.

Material
non-GRe3
Treatment
glyphosate drifte3
Outcome
leaf nitrogene3
Direction
reducinge3
Value
7-16%e3
Setting
Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USAe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“glyphosate drift was simulated by direct application at 12.5% of the recommended label rate to non-GR corn (Zea mays L.) at 3 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP) during two field seasons in the Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–473 · show in text ↑
e3

“In non-GR corn, glyphosate drift did not affect starch content but increased seed protein 8-21% while reducing leaf nitrogen reductase activity 46-64%, leaf nitrogen 7-16%, grain yield 49-54%, and seed oil 18-23%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated glyphosate drift reduced grain yield by 49-54% in non-GR corn.

Material
non-GRe3
Treatment
glyphosate drifte3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
reducinge3
Value
49-54%e3
Setting
Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USAe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“glyphosate drift was simulated by direct application at 12.5% of the recommended label rate to non-GR corn (Zea mays L.) at 3 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP) during two field seasons in the Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–473 · show in text ↑
e3

“In non-GR corn, glyphosate drift did not affect starch content but increased seed protein 8-21% while reducing leaf nitrogen reductase activity 46-64%, leaf nitrogen 7-16%, grain yield 49-54%, and seed oil 18-23%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated glyphosate drift reduced seed oil by 18-23% in non-GR corn.

Material
non-GRe3
Treatment
glyphosate drifte3
Outcome
seed oile3
Direction
reducinge3
Value
18-23%e3
Setting
Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USAe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“glyphosate drift was simulated by direct application at 12.5% of the recommended label rate to non-GR corn (Zea mays L.) at 3 or 6 weeks after planting (WAP) during two field seasons in the Mississippi delta region of the southeastern USA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 235–473 · show in text ↑
e3

“In non-GR corn, glyphosate drift did not affect starch content but increased seed protein 8-21% while reducing leaf nitrogen reductase activity 46-64%, leaf nitrogen 7-16%, grain yield 49-54%, and seed oil 18-23%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at label rates did not affect corn yield in GR and GR-stacked corn.

Material
GR and GR stacked with glufosinate-resistant corne4
Treatment
glyphosate applied at label ratese4
Outcome
corn yielde4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In GR and GR stacked with glufosinate-resistant corn, glyphosate applied at label rates did not affect corn yield, leaf and seed nitrogen, or seed composition (protein, oil, and starch content)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at label rates did not affect leaf and seed nitrogen in GR and GR-stacked corn.

Material
GR and GR stacked with glufosinate-resistant corne4
Treatment
glyphosate applied at label ratese4
Outcome
leaf and seed nitrogene4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In GR and GR stacked with glufosinate-resistant corn, glyphosate applied at label rates did not affect corn yield, leaf and seed nitrogen, or seed composition (protein, oil, and starch content)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at label rates did not affect seed composition in GR and GR-stacked corn.

Material
GR and GR stacked with glufosinate-resistant corne4
Treatment
glyphosate applied at label ratese4
Outcome
seed compositione4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Qualifier
protein, oil, and starch contente4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“In GR and GR stacked with glufosinate-resistant corn, glyphosate applied at label rates did not affect corn yield, leaf and seed nitrogen, or seed composition (protein, oil, and starch content)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 840 + 840 g/ha reduced nitrate reductase activity by 5-19% in GR and GR-stacked corn.

Material
GR and GR stacked corne5
Treatment
glyphosate at 840 + 840 g/ha ratee5
Outcome
nitrate reductase activitye5
Direction
reducede5
Value
5-19%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Yet, nitrate reductase activity was reduced 5-19% with glyphosate at 840 + 840 g/ha rate and 8-42% with glyphosate at 1260 + 1260 g/ha rate in both GR and GR stacked corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate at 1260 + 1260 g/ha reduced nitrate reductase activity by 8-42% in GR and GR-stacked corn.

Material
GR and GR stacked corne5
Treatment
glyphosate at 1260 + 1260 g/ha ratee5
Outcome
nitrate reductase activitye5
Direction
reducede5
Value
8-42%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Yet, nitrate reductase activity was reduced 5-19% with glyphosate at 840 + 840 g/ha rate and 8-42% with glyphosate at 1260 + 1260 g/ha rate in both GR and GR stacked corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1653 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

77 papers: 42 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

glyphosate · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 3 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

glyphosate · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.