Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Glyphosate or insect resistance from genetic modification was not likely to significantly alter productivity or nutrient composition of corn residue or grain when insect pest or weed pressure and glyphosate application were absent.

A claim from Grain and biomass nutrient uptake of conventional corn and their genetically modified isolines · 2016

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate or insect resistance from genetic modification was not likely to significantly alter productivity or nutrient composition of corn residue or grain when insect pest or weed pressure and glyphosate application were absent.

Treatment
glyphosate or insect resistance resulting from genetic modificatione3
Outcome
productivity or nutrient composition of corn residue or graine3
Direction
not likely to significantly altere3
Qualifier
in the absence of significant insect pest or weed pressure and glyphosate applicatione3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“glyphosate or insect resistance resulting from genetic modification, in the absence of significant insect pest or weed pressure and glyphosate application, were not likely to significantly alter productivity or nutrient composition of corn residue or grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–952

Title

Grain and biomass nutrient uptake of conventional corn and their genetically modified isolines

Shannon L. Osborne; R. Michael Lehman; Kurt A. Rosentrater Journal of Plant Nutrition 2016. doi:10.1080/01904167.2016.1187753

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-a4e6bdc1c607475196cce4d5e33602cef776f7ce1c5b0194811460e02ccddad6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.