Intervention effectmodel-written summary

LTLT infrared blanching retained 69.2 ± 2.9% vitamin C versus 50.7 ± 9.6% under water blanching.

A claim from Effect of Infrared Blanching on Enzyme Activity and Retention of β‐Carotene and Vitamin C in Dried Mango · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LTLT infrared blanching retained 69.2 ± 2.9% vitamin C versus 50.7 ± 9.6% under water blanching.

Treatment
IR dry blanchinge0
Outcome
retention of vitamin Ce0
Direction
highere0
Value
69.2 ± 2.9%e0
Qualifier
50.7 ± 9.6%e0
Comparator
water blanchinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher retention of vitamin C was observed in mango subjected to IR dry blanching, 88.3 ± 1.0% (HTST) and 69.2 ± 2.9% (LTLT), compared with water blanching, 61.4 ± 5.3% (HTST) and 50.7 ± 9.6% (LTLT).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1004

Title

Effect of Infrared Blanching on Enzyme Activity and Retention of β‐Carotene and Vitamin C in Dried Mango

Isabel R.F. Guiamba; Ulf Svanberg; Lilia Ahrné Journal of Food Science 2015. doi:10.1111/1750-3841.12866

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-ca0c1434741968cd3ee53081820d598e641b099c8bc40d03911a13ea3846ce70 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.