Claim · model-written summary
Dark-grown Arabidopsis differed from det and cop mutants.
- Taxon
- Arabidopsis
Arabidopsist0 - Material
- Dark-grown plantse0
- Outcome
- were differente0
- Comparator
- det and cope0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dark-grown plants showed similarities with phytochrome-deficient mutants and were different from de-etiolated or constitutive photomorphogenesis mutants such as det and cop.”
t0“Arabidopsis”
Title
Marta Roldán; Concepción Gómez‐Mena; Leonor Ruiz‐García; et al. The Plant Journal 1999. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00632.x
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Arabidopsis developed and flowered in complete darkness on vertical solid agar dishes with sucrose.
- Observation All tested Arabidopsis ecotypes developed into etiolated plants and flowered after producing leaves under these conditions.
- Observation Dark-grown Arabidopsis resembled phytochrome-deficient mutants.
- Observation Early and late flowering ecotypes flowered with a similar leaf number in darkness.
- Mechanism Sucrose availability on the aerial plant part interacted with darkness to cause rapid flowering of late flowering ecotypes.
- Intervention effect Sucrose also affected Arabidopsis flowering in the light.
- Observation Gibberellin deficient and insensitive mutants were delayed in flower initiation in darkness.
- Intervention effect Dark growth rescued late flowering in mutants of autonomous and long day dependent pathways.
- Intervention effect Sucrose did not rescue late flowering of ft and fwa mutants in darkness or light.