Paper · 1999 · The Plant Journal

Sucrose availability on the aerial part of the plant promotes morphogenesis and flowering of Arabidopsis in the dark

Marta Roldán; Concepción Gómez‐Mena; Leonor Ruiz‐García; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
199
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Conditions to promote dark morphogenesis and flower-ing in Arabidopsis have previously been limited to liquid cultures and to a few laboratory ecotypes. We have obtained development and flowering of Arabidopsis plants under complete darkness by growing them on vertical Petri dishes containing solid agar medium with sucrose. Under these conditions, all the ecotypes tested were able to develop, giving rise to etiolated plants that flowered after producing a certain number of leaves. Dark-grown plants showed similarities with phytochrome-deficient mutants and were different from de-etiolated or constitutive photomorphogenesis mutants such as det and cop. Late- and early-flowering ecotypes, showing large differences in flowering time and leaf number under long days, flowered with a similar number of leaves when grown in the dark. Rapid dark flowering of late-flowering ecotypes was not an effect of darkness but the result of the interaction between dark and sucrose availability at the aerial part of the plant, since sucrose also had an effect when plants were grown in the light. Gibberellin-deficient and insensitive mutants were delayed in the initiation of flowers in the dark, indicating a role for these hormones in flowering promotion in the dark. The late-flowering phenotype of mutants at different loci of the autonomous and long-day-dependent flowering induction pathways was rescued in dark growth conditions. However, the late-flowering phenotype of ft and fwa mutants was not rescued by sucrose either in the dark or in the light, suggesting a different role for these genes in flowering induction.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arabidopsis developed and flowered in complete darkness on vertical solid agar dishes with sucrose.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsise0
Treatment
solid agar medium with sucrosee0
Outcome
development and floweringe0
Setting
vertical Petri dishese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We have obtained development and flowering of Arabidopsis plants under complete darkness by growing them on vertical Petri dishes containing solid agar medium with sucrose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–325 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested Arabidopsis ecotypes developed into etiolated plants and flowered after producing leaves under these conditions.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
all the ecotypes testede0
Outcome
etiolated plants that flowerede0
Qualifier
after producing a certain number of leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under these conditions, all the ecotypes tested were able to develop, giving rise to etiolated plants that flowered after producing a certain number of leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark-grown Arabidopsis resembled phytochrome-deficient mutants.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
Dark-grown plantse0
Outcome
showed similaritiese0
Comparator
phytochrome-deficient mutantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dark-grown plants showed similarities with phytochrome-deficient mutants and were different from de-etiolated or constitutive photomorphogenesis mutants such as det and cop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark-grown Arabidopsis differed from det and cop mutants.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
Dark-grown plantse0
Outcome
were differente0
Comparator
det and cope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dark-grown plants showed similarities with phytochrome-deficient mutants and were different from de-etiolated or constitutive photomorphogenesis mutants such as det and cop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early and late flowering ecotypes flowered with a similar leaf number in darkness.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
Late- and early-flowering ecotypese0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
long dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Late- and early-flowering ecotypes, showing large differences in flowering time and leaf number under long days, flowered with a similar number of leaves when grown in the dark.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose availability on the aerial plant part interacted with darkness to cause rapid flowering of late flowering ecotypes.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
late-flowering ecotypese0
Organ / stage
aerial part of the plante0
Compound
sucrosee0
Outcome
Rapid dark floweringe0
Qualifier
interaction between dark and sucrose availabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rapid dark flowering of late-flowering ecotypes was not an effect of darkness but the result of the interaction between dark and sucrose availability at the aerial part of the plant, since sucrose also had an effect when plants were grown in the light.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose also affected Arabidopsis flowering in the light.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Treatment
sucrosee0
Outcome
effecte0
Qualifier
when plants were grown in the lighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sucrose also had an effect when plants were grown in the light.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellin deficient and insensitive mutants were delayed in flower initiation in darkness.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
Gibberellin-deficient and insensitive mutantse0
Outcome
initiation of flowerse0
Direction
delayede0
Qualifier
in the darke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gibberellin-deficient and insensitive mutants were delayed in the initiation of flowers in the dark, indicating a role for these hormones in flowering promotion in the dark.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dark growth rescued late flowering in mutants of autonomous and long day dependent pathways.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Material
mutants at different loci of the autonomous and long-day-dependent flowering induction pathwayse0
Treatment
dark growth conditionse0
Outcome
late-flowering phenotypee0
Direction
rescuede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The late-flowering phenotype of mutants at different loci of the autonomous and long-day-dependent flowering induction pathways was rescued in dark growth conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1431 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose did not rescue late flowering of ft and fwa mutants in darkness or light.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsist0
Treatment
sucrosee0
Gene
ft and fwae0
Outcome
late-flowering phenotypee0
Direction
not rescuede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the late-flowering phenotype of ft and fwa mutants was not rescued by sucrose either in the dark or in the light,”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1554 · show in text ↑
t0

“Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑

agar · growth · ArabidopsisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

sucrose · growth · ArabidopsisPositive and negative results

17 papers: 9 positive, 8 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

in vitro · growth · ArabidopsisPositive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.