Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At Clarksville, increasing seeding from 38 to 57 seeds/sq ft reduced delay-associated yield loss by 49%.

A claim from Optimizing Seeding Rate for Late‐Seeded Winter Wheat in the Middle Atlantic Region · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At Clarksville, increasing seeding from 38 to 57 seeds/sq ft reduced delay-associated yield loss by 49%.

Treatment
seeding rate was increased from 38 to 57 seeds/sq fte0
Outcome
yield loss caused by the delaye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
49%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield loss caused by the delay was reduced by 49% when seeding rate was increased from 38 to 57 seeds/sq ft”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4214–4325
t0

“Optimizing Seeding Rate for Late‐Seeded Winter Wheat in the Middle Atlantic Region”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–82

Title

Optimizing Seeding Rate for Late‐Seeded Winter Wheat in the Middle Atlantic Region

Qi‐Yuan Pan; David J. Sammons; Robert J. Kratochvil jpa 1994. doi:10.2134/jpa1994.0221

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-cb05d0bb37d092efd265897cef50471ef7ee3877fbb2664ed289ae1bcb46ba23 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.