Claim · model-written summary
In conservation agriculture, 125 kg N ha -1 gave yields comparable to 150 kg N ha -1.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The 125 kg N ha -1 produced yields comparable to 150 kg N ha -1 in CA”
t0“maize”
Title
Kiranmoy Patra; C.M. Parihar; Ayan Sarkar; et al. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2026.102800
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Conservation agriculture improved maize canopy development, biomass and yield over conventional tillage and farmer practice.
- Intervention effect Zero-till and permanent beds had the highest pooled maize grain yield.
- Intervention effect The 150 kg N ha -1 rate added biomass largely as stover.
- Intervention effect Conservation agriculture improved nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency.
- Intervention effect Conservation agriculture enriched and stabilized mineral nitrogen in upper soil layers and improved soil water content.
- Intervention effect Conservation agriculture produced the highest net returns and benefit–cost ratios.
- Intervention effect Zero-till with 125 kg N ha -1 produced returns comparable to 150 kg N ha -1 with lower input cost.
- Observation Conservation agriculture nearly doubled topsoil soil organic carbon from the 2008 baseline.