Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conservation agriculture produced the highest net returns and benefit–cost ratios.

A claim from Beneath-the-surface nitrogen placement sustains maize productivity and soil health under long-term conservation agriculture in the NW Indo-Gangetic Plains · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture produced the highest net returns and benefit–cost ratios.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
CAe0
Outcome
Net returns and benefit–cost ratiose0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
CTe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CA consistently enhanced canopy development, phasic biomass, and final yield versus CT and FP. Pooled grain yield was highest under zero-till and permanent beds (6118 kg ha -1 ), exceeding CT (5400 kg ha -1 ) and FP (5265 kg ha -1 ). The 125 kg N ha -1 produced yields comparable to 150 kg N ha -1 in CA, while additional biomass at 150 kg N ha -1 accrued largely as stover. Nitrogen uptake and efficiency were superior under CA (zero-till: 146 kg N ha -1 uptake), with NUEs peaking at 125 kg N ha -1 . CA enriched and stabilized mineral N in surface and near-surface layers, and improved soil water content across 0–30 cm. Net returns and benefit–cost ratios were highest under CA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–1419
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53

Title

Beneath-the-surface nitrogen placement sustains maize productivity and soil health under long-term conservation agriculture in the NW Indo-Gangetic Plains

Kiranmoy Patra; C.M. Parihar; Ayan Sarkar; et al. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2026.102800

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-46d9bcd58c9451d27437483e96e282c9facb36c68a4a2f36efc9b7581d56ebe3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.