Intervention effectmodel-written summary

P did not improve groundnut yields over the control.

A claim from Groundnut Response to Ash, Phosphorus, Lime and Tillage in Southern Cameroon · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P did not improve groundnut yields over the control.

Taxon
GroundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
Pe4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
did not improvee4
Comparator
the controle4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L) is an important intercrop in southern Cameroon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–86
e4

“P, K or tillage did not improve yields over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1160

Title

Groundnut Response to Ash, Phosphorus, Lime and Tillage in Southern Cameroon

J. W. Wendt Biological Agriculture & Horticulture 2002. doi:10.1080/01448765.2002.9754964

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-cc4d71998dcb653f27575afc3a1d2ad150d0abfd23203c3b202ff0719163c380 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

178 papers: 160 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 160 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

169 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.