Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar micronutrient application gave a higher total soluble solids, 11.6 oBrix

A claim from Nutrient management study in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L) cv. mosambi · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar micronutrient application gave a higher total soluble solids, 11.6 oBrix

Taxon
sweet orangeCitrus sinensist0
Material
cv. mosambit0
Treatment
Foliar application of 4g CuSO4 (Copper sulfate)e0
Outcome
Total Soluble Solidse1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
11.6 oBrixe1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus sinensis
Citrus sinensis · TaxonEllen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of 4g CuSO4 (Copper sulfate)+ 2g FeSO4 (Ferrous sulfate), + 2g Borax+ 4g ZnSO4 (Zinc sulfate) + 4g MgSO4 (Magnesium sulphate) + 10g lime per liter water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–365
e1

“Total Soluble Solids (11.6 oBrix)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–737
t0

“sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L) cv. mosambi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–73

Title

Nutrient management study in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L) cv. mosambi

Purnima Singh Sikarwar; K. S. Tomar Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-cc8927feb1332152b2ca5981640bda3bff05a3fa4189e29624995ddb1f86b86b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

copper(II) sulfate · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Citrus sinensis (sweet orange)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.