Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Drip irrigation had higher water use efficiency of 17.1 kg ha mm-1 than sprinkler irrigation at 11.5 kg ha mm-1.

A claim from On-Farm Drip Irrigation in Rice for Higher Productivity and Profitability in Haryana, India · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation had higher water use efficiency of 17.1 kg ha mm-1 than sprinkler irrigation at 11.5 kg ha mm-1.

Treatment
drip irrigation methode0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
17.1 kg ha mm-1e0
Qualifier
11.5 kg ha mm-1e0
Comparator
sprinkler methode0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip irrigation method of paddy cultivation was recorded considerable higher water use efficiency (17.1 kg ha mm-1) followed by sprinkler method (11.5 kg ha mm-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–904
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–31

Title

On-Farm Drip Irrigation in Rice for Higher Productivity and Profitability in Haryana, India

P. Soman; Sarvan Singh; A.K. Bhardwaj; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.064

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-ccb050d4d2ec67f489f1477e20d419aea6f1400a6e1333e39fe78299d60a0585 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this claim · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.