Intervention effectmodel-written summary

SRI had greater root volume and dry mass than the conventional method.

A claim from System of Rice Intensification: Its Present Status, Future Prospects and Role in Seed Production in India · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI had greater root volume and dry mass than the conventional method.

Treatment
SRIe0
Outcome
Root volume, dry masse0
Direction
highere0
Value
7-25%e0
Comparator
conventional methode0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root volume, dry mass and dehydrogenase activity in soil enhanced by 7-25% (measure of microbial activity) were found to be higher in SRI, compared with conventional method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1323
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–14

Title

System of Rice Intensification: Its Present Status, Future Prospects and Role in Seed Production in India

R. Mahender Kumar; LV Subba Rao; V Ramesh Babu; et al. 2013

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-ccc6fedb1c20ca6501e55ddaa53d466a883505b34de2852b9f41612afb75ef9f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this claim · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

282 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.