Claim · model-written summary
SRI did not deplete soil available nutrients after two seasons.
- Taxon
- Rice
Oryza sativat0 - Treatment
- SRIe0
- Outcome
- soil available nutrientse0
- Direction
- without depletinge0
- Comparator
- conventional transplantinge0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“SRI also recorded higher nutrient use efficiency without depleting soil available nutrients as compared to conventional transplantingafter two seasons of the study”
t0“Rice”
Title
R. Mahender Kumar; LV Subba Rao; V Ramesh Babu; et al. 2013
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect SRI produced 7-20% higher grain yield than traditional irrigated transplanted rice.
- Intervention effect SRI had higher nutrient use efficiency than conventional transplanting.
- Observation Better tillering varieties and named hybrids had higher grain yield than moderate tillering varieties and scented cultivars.
- Intervention effect SRI had greater root volume and dry mass than the conventional method.
- Intervention effect SRI had higher soil dehydrogenase activity than conventional management.
- Intervention effect SRI reduced seed rate by 80%.
- Intervention effect SRI reduced water requirement by 29%.
- Intervention effect SRI reduced growth duration by 8-12 days.
- Intervention effect SRI reduced nursery area.
- Intervention effect SRI enhanced water and per day productivity.
- Observation SRI helped produce more and higher quality seed.
- Recommendation The authors recommend SRI where water is scarce.