Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seedlings on the former red alder site showed a 41% biomass increase in older twigs compared with former Douglas-fir sites.

A claim from Effect of soil changes caused by red alder (Alnusrubra) on biomass and nutrient status of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsugamenziesii) seedlings · 1990

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedlings on the former red alder site showed a 41% biomass increase in older twigs compared with former Douglas-fir sites.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiie0
Organ / stage
older twigse1
Treatment
former red alder sitee1
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
increasee1
Value
41%e1
Comparator
former Douglas-fire2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the biomass and nutrition of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsugamenziesii (Mirb.) Franco) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–157
e1

“The seedlings grown on the former red alder site showed a 65% biomass increase in current twigs, 41% increase in older twigs, and 45% increase in stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–420
e2

“comparing two adjacent plots of seedlings planted on former Douglas-fir and red alder sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–267

Title

Effect of soil changes caused by red alder (Alnusrubra) on biomass and nutrient status of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsugamenziesii) seedlings

Stanislaw Brozek Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1990. doi:10.1139/x90-175

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-ccd82a26a5f0e54d4c76e0a67f729630a3d045203099a16cc460ff7dbed21435 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

climate site · growth · Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.