Intervention effectmodel-written summary

SeMNF raised carotenoids by 39%.

A claim from Foliar Sprays of Multi-Nutrient Fertilizer Containing Selenium Produce Functional Tomato Fruits with Higher Shelf Life · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SeMNF raised carotenoids by 39%.

Treatment
SeMNF at Se doses above 10 g of Se ha−1e0
Outcome
contents of carotenoidse0
Direction
highere0
Value
+39%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SeMNF at Se doses above 10 g of Se ha−1 increased firmness, days of ripening, and the nutritional quality of the tomatoes (higher contents of carotenoids (+39%), lycopene (+33%), antioxidant activity (+16%), total phenolic compounds (+38%), and vitamin C (+14%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1608
e1

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–672

Title

Foliar Sprays of Multi-Nutrient Fertilizer Containing Selenium Produce Functional Tomato Fruits with Higher Shelf Life

Everton Geraldo de Morais; Maila Adriely Silva; Anyela Pierina Vega Quispe; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13162288

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-cd2ce42b069ded1cc71f2805afe40b993c3ef8d8416a2730991bc4e6891699fc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

selenium atom · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 84 positive, 21 negative or no effect

83 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.