Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ozone had no statistically significant effect on PEPC activity in pine needles.

A claim from Elevated CO2 does not ameliorate effects of ozone on carbon allocation in Pinus halepensis and Betula pendula in symbiosis with Paxillus involutus · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone had no statistically significant effect on PEPC activity in pine needles.

Taxon
pinePinuse6
Organ / stage
pine needlese6
Treatment
Ozonee7
Outcome
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC)e7
Direction
no statistically significant effectse7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus
Pinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest Service Northern Region from Missoula, MT, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“in the pine needles or on PEPC activity in pine roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1221
e7

“Ozone stimulated the spread of mycorrhizal infection from the birch seedlings to neighbouring pines and had no statistically significant effects on phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) or ribulose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1109

Title

Elevated CO2 does not ameliorate effects of ozone on carbon allocation in Pinus halepensis and Betula pendula in symbiosis with Paxillus involutus

M.‐M. Kytöviita; J. Pelloux; V. Fontaine; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 1999. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.106403.x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-cd93f11c9f4a283072f7f6a93257413642af0f0d3d2249ec1486ab3c20f7326c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

ozone · molecular: metabolites · PinusResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.