Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Elevated CO2 had no effect on the growth of Betula pendula or Pinus halepensis seedlings under low nutrient and ozone levels.

A claim from Elevated CO2 does not ameliorate effects of ozone on carbon allocation in Pinus halepensis and Betula pendula in symbiosis with Paxillus involutus · 1999

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 had no effect on the growth of Betula pendula or Pinus halepensis seedlings under low nutrient and ozone levels.

Taxon
B. pendula or P. halepensisBetula pendulaPinus halepensise0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
under low nutrient and ozone levelse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pinus halepensis
Pinus halepensis · Taxonspacebirdy (also known as geimfyglið (:> )=| made with Sternenlaus -spirit) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results show that under low nutrient and ozone levels, elevated CO2 has no effect on the growth of B. pendula or P. halepensis seedlings nor on net carbon partitioning between plant parts”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 240–432

Title

Elevated CO2 does not ameliorate effects of ozone on carbon allocation in Pinus halepensis and Betula pendula in symbiosis with Paxillus involutus

M.‐M. Kytöviita; J. Pelloux; V. Fontaine; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 1999. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.106403.x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-b09916deb868aa814a5582078e05ec5f149534163309515606b4066fc7876f96 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

co2 · growth · Pinus halepensis (Aleppo pine)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

co2 · growth · Betula pendula (white birch)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. no effect
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.