Paper · 2013 · New Phytologist

Elevated CO2 enrichment induces a differential biomass response in a mixed species temperate forest plantation

Andrew R. Smith; Martin Lukac; Robin Hood; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
50
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

In a free-air carbon dioxide (CO(2)) enrichment study (BangorFACE), Alnus glutinosa, Betula pendula and Fagus sylvatica were planted in areas of one-, two- and three-species mixtures (n = 4). The trees were exposed to ambient or elevated CO(2) (580 μmol mol(-1)) for 4 yr, and aboveground growth characteristics were measured. In monoculture, the mean effect of CO(2) enrichment on aboveground woody biomass was + 29, + 22 and + 16% for A. glutinosa, F. sylvatica and B. pendula, respectively. When the same species were grown in polyculture, the response to CO(2) switched to + 10, + 7 and 0% for A. glutinosa, B. pendula and F. sylvatica, respectively. In ambient atmosphere, our species grown in polyculture increased aboveground woody biomass from 12.9 ± 1.4 to 18.9 ± 1.0 kg m(-2), whereas, in an elevated CO(2) atmosphere, aboveground woody biomass increased from 15.2 ± 0.6 to 20.2 ± 0.6 kg m(-2). The overyielding effect of polyculture was smaller (+ 7%) in elevated CO(2) than in an ambient atmosphere (+ 18%). Our results show that the aboveground response to elevated CO(2) is affected significantly by intra- and interspecific competition, and that the elevated CO(2) response may be reduced in forest communities comprising tree species with contrasting functional traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In monoculture, elevated CO2 raised Alnus glutinosa woody biomass by 29%.

Taxon
A. glutinosaAlnus glutinosae0
Treatment
CO(2) enrichmente0
Outcome
aboveground woody biomasse0
Direction
effecte0
Value
+ 29e0
Comparator
ambiente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus glutinosa
Alnus glutinosa · TaxonAEngelhardt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In monoculture, the mean effect of CO(2) enrichment on aboveground woody biomass was + 29, + 22 and + 16% for A. glutinosa, F. sylvatica and B. pendula, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–493 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alnus glutinosa, Betula pendula and Fagus sylvatica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–119 · show in text ↑
e2

“ambient or elevated CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In monoculture, elevated CO2 raised Fagus sylvatica woody biomass by 22%.

Taxon
F. sylvaticaFagus sylvaticae0
Treatment
CO(2) enrichmente0
Outcome
aboveground woody biomasse0
Value
+ 22e0
Comparator
ambiente1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In monoculture, the mean effect of CO(2) enrichment on aboveground woody biomass was + 29, + 22 and + 16% for A. glutinosa, F. sylvatica and B. pendula, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–493 · show in text ↑
e1

“ambient or elevated CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In monoculture, elevated CO2 raised Betula pendula woody biomass by 16%.

Taxon
B. pendulaBetula pendulae0
Treatment
CO(2) enrichmente0
Outcome
aboveground woody biomasse0
Value
+ 16%e0
Comparator
ambiente1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In monoculture, the mean effect of CO(2) enrichment on aboveground woody biomass was + 29, + 22 and + 16% for A. glutinosa, F. sylvatica and B. pendula, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–493 · show in text ↑
e1

“ambient or elevated CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In polyculture, Alnus glutinosa biomass response to CO2 was 10%.

Taxon
A. glutinosaAlnus glutinosae0
Treatment
CO(2)e0
Outcome
aboveground woody biomasse1
Value
+ 10e0
Comparator
ambiente2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alnus glutinosa
Alnus glutinosa · TaxonAEngelhardt · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the same species were grown in polyculture, the response to CO(2) switched to + 10, + 7 and 0% for A. glutinosa, B. pendula and F. sylvatica, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“aboveground woody biomass was + 29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–416 · show in text ↑
e2

“ambient or elevated CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In polyculture, Betula pendula biomass response to CO2 was 7%.

Taxon
B. pendulaBetula pendulae0
Treatment
CO(2)e0
Outcome
aboveground woody biomasse1
Value
+ 7e0
Comparator
ambiente2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Betula pendula
Betula pendula · TaxonPercita at Flickr · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the same species were grown in polyculture, the response to CO(2) switched to + 10, + 7 and 0% for A. glutinosa, B. pendula and F. sylvatica, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“aboveground woody biomass was + 29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–416 · show in text ↑
e2

“ambient or elevated CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In polyculture, Fagus sylvatica biomass response to CO2 was 0%.

Taxon
F. sylvaticaFagus sylvaticae0
Treatment
CO(2)e0
Outcome
aboveground woody biomasse1
Value
0%e0
Comparator
ambiente2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the same species were grown in polyculture, the response to CO(2) switched to + 10, + 7 and 0% for A. glutinosa, B. pendula and F. sylvatica, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–654 · show in text ↑
e1

“aboveground woody biomass was + 29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–416 · show in text ↑
e2

“ambient or elevated CO(2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species mixtures increased aboveground biomass in ambient atmosphere.

Taxon
speciese0
Treatment
polyculturee0
Outcome
aboveground woody biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.9 ± 1.0 kg m(-2)e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In ambient atmosphere, our species grown in polyculture increased aboveground woody biomass from 12.9 ± 1.4 to 18.9 ± 1.0 kg m(-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species mixtures increased aboveground biomass under elevated CO2.

Taxon
treese1
Treatment
elevated CO(2) atmospheree0
Outcome
aboveground woody biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.2 ± 0.6 kg m(-2)e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in an elevated CO(2) atmosphere, aboveground woody biomass increased from 15.2 ± 0.6 to 20.2 ± 0.6 kg m(-2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–903 · show in text ↑
e1

“The trees were exposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyculture overyielding was smaller under elevated CO2 than ambient CO2.

Taxon
treese1
Treatment
elevated CO(2)e0
Outcome
overyielding effect of polyculturee0
Direction
smallere0
Value
+ 7%e0
Qualifier
+ 18%e0
Comparator
ambient atmospheree0

Verbatim

e0

“The overyielding effect of polyculture was smaller (+ 7%) in elevated CO(2) than in an ambient atmosphere (+ 18%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“The trees were exposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–214 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Betula pendula (white birch)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

co2 · growth · Fagus sylvatica (European beech)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

co2 · growth · Alnus glutinosaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.