Paper · 2007 · Tree Physiology

Temperature responses of growth and wood anatomy in European beech saplings grown in different carbon dioxide concentrations

D. Overdieck; D. Ziche; K. Bottcher-Jungclaus

20
claims
48
verbatim quotes
54
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effects of temperature on growth and wood anatomy were studied in young European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) grown in 7-l pots for 2.5 years in field-phytotron chambers supplied with an ambient (approximately 400 micromol mol-1) or elevated (approximately 700 micromol mol-1) carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]). Temperatures in the chambers ranged in increments of 2 degrees C from -4 degrees C to +4 degrees C relative to the long-term mean monthly (day and night) air temperature in Berlin-Dahlem. Soil was not fertilized and soil water and air humidity were kept constant. Data were evaluated by regression analysis. At final harvest, stem diameter was significantly greater at increased temperature (Delta1 degrees C: 2.4%), stems were taller (Delta1 degrees C: 8.5%) and stem mass tree-1 (Delta1 degrees C: 10.9%) and leaf area tree-1(Delta1 degrees C: 6.5%) were greater. Allocation pattern was slightly influenced by temperature: leaf mass ratio and leaf area ratio decreased with increasing temperature (Delta1 degrees C: 2.3% and 2.2% respectively), whereas stem mass/total mass increased (Delta1 degrees C: 2.1%). Elevated [CO2] enhanced height growth by 8.8% and decreased coarse root mass/total mass by 10.3% and root/shoot ratio by 11.7%. Additional carbon was mainly invested in aboveground growth. At final harvest a synergistic interaction between elevated [CO2] and temperature yielded trees that were 3.2% taller at -4 degrees C and 12.7% taller at +4 degrees C than trees in ambient [CO2]. After 2.5 seasons, cross-sectional area of the oldest stem part was approximately 32% greater in the +4 degrees C treatment than in the -4 degrees C treatment, and in the last year approximately 67% more leaf area/unit tree ring area was produced in the highest temperature regime compared with the lowest. Elevated [CO2] decreased mean vessel area of the 120 largest vessels per mm2 by 5.8%, causing a decrease in water conducting capacity. There was a positive interaction between temperature and elevated [CO2] for relative vessel area, which was approximately 38% higher at +4 degrees C than at -4 degrees C in elevated [CO2] compared with ambient [CO2]. Overall, temperature had a greater effect on growth than [CO2], but elevated [CO2] caused quantitative changes in wood anatomy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher temperature increased stem diameter by 2.4% per degree C.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
increased temperaturee0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
greatere0
Value
2.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem diameter was significantly greater at increased temperature (Delta1 degrees C: 2.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher temperature increased stem height by 8.5% per degree C.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
temperaturee2
Outcome
stemse0
Direction
tallere0
Value
8.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stems were taller (Delta1 degrees C: 8.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“stem diameter was significantly greater at increased temperature (Delta1 degrees C: 2.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher temperature increased stem mass per tree by 10.9% per degree C.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
temperaturee2
Outcome
stem mass tree-1e0
Direction
greatere0
Value
10.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem mass tree-1 (Delta1 degrees C: 10.9%) and leaf area tree-1(Delta1 degrees C: 6.5%) were greater.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“stem diameter was significantly greater at increased temperature (Delta1 degrees C: 2.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher temperature increased leaf area per tree by 6.5% per degree C.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
temperaturee2
Outcome
leaf area tree-1e0
Direction
greatere0
Value
6.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem mass tree-1 (Delta1 degrees C: 10.9%) and leaf area tree-1(Delta1 degrees C: 6.5%) were greater.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“stem diameter was significantly greater at increased temperature (Delta1 degrees C: 2.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing temperature decreased leaf mass ratio by 2.3% per degree C.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
increasing temperaturee0
Outcome
leaf mass ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf mass ratio and leaf area ratio decreased with increasing temperature (Delta1 degrees C: 2.3% and 2.2% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing temperature decreased leaf area ratio by 2.2% per degree C.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
increasing temperaturee0
Outcome
leaf area ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
2.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf mass ratio and leaf area ratio decreased with increasing temperature (Delta1 degrees C: 2.3% and 2.2% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing temperature increased stem mass relative to total mass by 2.1% per degree C.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
temperaturee2
Outcome
stem mass/total masse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem mass/total mass increased (Delta1 degrees C: 2.1%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“stem diameter was significantly greater at increased temperature (Delta1 degrees C: 2.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide enhanced height growth by 8.8%.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
height growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
8.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [CO2] enhanced height growth by 8.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide decreased coarse root mass relative to total mass by 10.3%.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e2
Outcome
coarse root mass/total masse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
10.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased coarse root mass/total mass by 10.3% and root/shoot ratio by 11.7%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated [CO2] enhanced height growth by 8.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide decreased root to shoot ratio by 11.7%.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e2
Outcome
root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
11.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased coarse root mass/total mass by 10.3% and root/shoot ratio by 11.7%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated [CO2] enhanced height growth by 8.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1170 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional carbon was mainly invested in aboveground growth.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Outcome
aboveground growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional carbon was mainly invested in aboveground growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With elevated carbon dioxide, trees were 3.2% taller at minus 4 degrees C than under ambient carbon dioxide.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e2
Outcome
treese0
Direction
tallere0
Value
3.2%e0
Qualifier
-4 degrees Ce0
Comparator
ambient [CO2]e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees that were 3.2% taller at -4 degrees C and 12.7% taller at +4 degrees C than trees in ambient [CO2].”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated [CO2] enhanced height growth by 8.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With elevated carbon dioxide, trees were 12.7% taller at plus 4 degrees C than under ambient carbon dioxide.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e2
Outcome
treese0
Direction
tallere0
Value
12.7%e0
Qualifier
+4 degrees Ce0
Comparator
ambient [CO2]e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“trees that were 3.2% taller at -4 degrees C and 12.7% taller at +4 degrees C than trees in ambient [CO2].”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated [CO2] enhanced height growth by 8.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 2.5 seasons, oldest stem cross-sectional area was about 32% greater at plus 4 versus minus 4 degrees C.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
+4 degrees C treatmente0
Outcome
cross-sectional area of the oldest stem parte0
Direction
greatere0
Value
approximately 32%e0
Comparator
-4 degrees C treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cross-sectional area of the oldest stem part was approximately 32% greater in the +4 degrees C treatment than in the -4 degrees C treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1668 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area per unit tree-ring area was about 67% greater at the highest versus lowest temperature.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
highest temperature regimee0
Outcome
leaf area/unit tree ring areae0
Direction
moree0
Value
approximately 67%e0
Comparator
the loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“approximately 67% more leaf area/unit tree ring area was produced in the highest temperature regime compared with the lowest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1816 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide decreased mean area of the largest vessels by 5.8%.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
Elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
mean vessel area of the 120 largest vessels per mm2e0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
5.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Elevated [CO2] decreased mean vessel area of the 120 largest vessels per mm2 by 5.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1817–1901 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced vessel area decreased water conducting capacity.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Outcome
water conducting capacitye0
Qualifier
causing a decreasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“causing a decrease in water conducting capacity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1903–1951 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative vessel area was about 38% higher at plus 4 than minus 4 degrees C under elevated carbon dioxide compared with ambient carbon dioxide.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
+4 degrees Ce0
Outcome
relative vessel areae0
Direction
highere0
Value
approximately 38%e0
Qualifier
elevated [CO2] compared with ambient [CO2]e0
Comparator
-4 degrees Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“relative vessel area, which was approximately 38% higher at +4 degrees C than at -4 degrees C in elevated [CO2] compared with ambient [CO2].”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2028–2168 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature had a greater effect on growth than carbon dioxide.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
[CO2]e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, temperature had a greater effect on growth than [CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2169–2231 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated carbon dioxide caused quantitative changes in wood anatomy.

Taxon
European beechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated [CO2]e0
Outcome
wood anatomye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated [CO2] caused quantitative changes in wood anatomy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2237–2296 · show in text ↑
t0

“European beech”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–66 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Fagus sylvatica (European beech)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.