Paper · 2016 · Plants

Interaction Effect between Elevated CO2 and Fertilization on Biomass, Gas Exchange and C/N Ratio of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)

Neda Lotfiomran; Michael Köhl; Jörg Fromm

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
33
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effects of elevated CO₂ and interaction effects between elevated CO₂ and nutrient supplies on growth and the C/N ratio of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) saplings were studied. One-year-old beech saplings were grown in a greenhouse at ambient (385 ppm) and elevated CO₂ (770 ppm/950 ppm), with or without fertilization for two growing seasons. In this study, emphasis is placed on the combined fertilization including phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen with two level of elevated CO₂. The fertilized plants grown under elevated CO₂ had the highest net leaf photosynthesis rate (Ac). The saplings grown under elevated CO₂ had a significantly lower stomatal conductance (gs) than saplings grown under ambient air. No interaction effect was found between elevated CO₂ and fertilization on Ac. A interaction effect between CO₂ and fertilization, as well as between date and fertilization and between date and CO₂ was detected on gs. Leaf chlorophyll content index (CCI) and leaf nitrogen content were strongly positively correlated to each other and both of them decreased under elevated CO₂. At the end of both growing seasons, stem dry weight was greater under elevated CO₂ and root dry weight was not affected by different treatments. No interaction effect was detected between elevated CO₂ and nutrient supplies on the dry weight of different plant tissues (stems and roots). However, elevated CO₂ caused a significant decrease in the nitrogen content of plant tissues. Nitrogen reduction in the leaves under elevated CO₂ was about 10% and distinctly higher than in the stem and root. The interaction effect of elevated CO₂ and fertilization on C/N ratio in plants tissues was significant. The results led to the conclusion that photosynthesis and the C/N ratio increased while stomatal conductance and leaf nitrogen content decreased under elevated CO₂ and nutrient-limited conditions. In general, under nutrient-limited conditions, the plant responses to elevated CO₂ were decreased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilized saplings under elevated CO₂ had the highest net leaf photosynthesis rate.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
fertilized plants grown under elevated CO₂e0
Outcome
net leaf photosynthesis ratee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilized plants grown under elevated CO₂ had the highest net leaf photosynthesis rate (Ac).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO₂ significantly lowered stomatal conductance relative to ambient air.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated CO₂e0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
ambient aire0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The saplings grown under elevated CO₂ had a significantly lower stomatal conductance (gs) than saplings grown under ambient air.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–719 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO₂ and fertilization did not interact for photosynthesis rate.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated CO₂ and fertilizatione0
Outcome
Ace0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No interaction effect was found between elevated CO₂ and fertilization on Ac.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO₂ and fertilization interacted for stomatal conductance.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
CO₂ and fertilizatione0
Outcome
gse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A interaction effect between CO₂ and fertilization, as well as between date and fertilization and between date and CO₂ was detected on gs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Date and fertilization interacted for stomatal conductance.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
date and fertilizatione0
Outcome
gse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A interaction effect between CO₂ and fertilization, as well as between date and fertilization and between date and CO₂ was detected on gs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Date and CO₂ interacted for stomatal conductance.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
date and CO₂e0
Outcome
gse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A interaction effect between CO₂ and fertilization, as well as between date and fertilization and between date and CO₂ was detected on gs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–936 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll content index and leaf nitrogen content were strongly positively correlated.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Compound
nitrogene0
Outcome
Leaf chlorophyll content index (CCI)e0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf chlorophyll content index (CCI) and leaf nitrogen content were strongly positively correlated to each other and both of them decreased under elevated CO₂.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf chlorophyll content index (CCI) decreased under elevated CO₂.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated CO₂e0
Outcome
Leaf chlorophyll content index (CCI)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf chlorophyll content index (CCI) and leaf nitrogen content were strongly positively correlated to each other and both of them decreased under elevated CO₂.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

leaf nitrogen content decreased under elevated CO₂.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated CO₂e0
Outcome
leaf nitrogen contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf chlorophyll content index (CCI) and leaf nitrogen content were strongly positively correlated to each other and both of them decreased under elevated CO₂.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO₂ increased stem dry weight at the end of both seasons.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated CO₂e0
Outcome
stem dry weighte0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the end of both growing seasons, stem dry weight was greater under elevated CO₂ and root dry weight was not affected by different treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different treatments did not affect root dry weight.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
root dry weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the end of both growing seasons, stem dry weight was greater under elevated CO₂ and root dry weight was not affected by different treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1241 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO₂ and nutrient supplies did not interact for stems dry weight.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Organ / stage
stemse0
Treatment
elevated CO₂ and nutrient suppliese0
Outcome
dry weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No interaction effect was detected between elevated CO₂ and nutrient supplies on the dry weight of different plant tissues (stems and roots).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO₂ and nutrient supplies did not interact for roots dry weight.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
elevated CO₂ and nutrient suppliese0
Outcome
dry weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No interaction effect was detected between elevated CO₂ and nutrient supplies on the dry weight of different plant tissues (stems and roots).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1383 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO₂ significantly decreased plant tissue nitrogen content.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated CO₂e0
Outcome
nitrogen content of plant tissuese0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, elevated CO₂ caused a significant decrease in the nitrogen content of plant tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1477 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO₂ reduced leaf nitrogen by about 10%, more than in stem and root.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated CO₂e0
Outcome
Nitrogen reduction in the leavese0
Direction
reductione0
Value
10%e0
Qualifier
distinctly higher than in the stem and roote0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen reduction in the leaves under elevated CO₂ was about 10% and distinctly higher than in the stem and root.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1592 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO₂ and fertilization significantly interacted for tissue C/N ratio.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated CO₂ and fertilizatione0
Outcome
C/N ratio in plants tissuese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction effect of elevated CO₂ and fertilization on C/N ratio in plants tissues was significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1593–1697 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

photosynthesis increased under elevated CO₂ and nutrient-limited conditions.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated CO₂ and nutrient-limited conditionse0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results led to the conclusion that photosynthesis and the C/N ratio increased while stomatal conductance and leaf nitrogen content decreased under elevated CO₂ and nutrient-limited conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1894 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

C/N ratio increased under elevated CO₂ and nutrient-limited conditions.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated CO₂ and nutrient-limited conditionse0
Outcome
C/N ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results led to the conclusion that photosynthesis and the C/N ratio increased while stomatal conductance and leaf nitrogen content decreased under elevated CO₂ and nutrient-limited conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1894 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

stomatal conductance decreased under elevated CO₂ and nutrient-limited conditions.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated CO₂ and nutrient-limited conditionse0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results led to the conclusion that photosynthesis and the C/N ratio increased while stomatal conductance and leaf nitrogen content decreased under elevated CO₂ and nutrient-limited conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1894 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

leaf nitrogen content decreased under elevated CO₂ and nutrient-limited conditions.

Taxon
European BeechFagus sylvaticat0
Treatment
elevated CO₂ and nutrient-limited conditionse0
Outcome
leaf nitrogen contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fagus sylvatica
Fagus sylvatica · TaxonMalene Thyssen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results led to the conclusion that photosynthesis and the C/N ratio increased while stomatal conductance and leaf nitrogen content decreased under elevated CO₂ and nutrient-limited conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1894 · show in text ↑
t0

“European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–135 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Fagus sylvatica (European beech)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

co2 · growth · Fagus sylvatica (European beech)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

co2 · physiology: pigments · Fagus sylvatica (European beech)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

co2 · nutrient: content · Fagus sylvatica (European beech)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.