Claim · model-written summary
Soil N declined under sole cropping.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“‘N’ enrichment was noticed in intercropping systems only and decreasing in sole cropping.”
e1“maize -soybean intercropping systems”
Title
Malve Sachin Himmatrao; R. Raghavaiah; Kadasiddappa Malamasuri; et al. Journal of progressive agriculture 2014
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect Intercropping reduced maize seed yield by 14.75 per cent at 1:1 ratio.
- Intervention effect Intercropping reduced maize seed yield by 11 per cent at 1:2 ratio.
- Intervention effect Intercropping reduced soybean seed yield by 52.19 per cent at 1:1 ratio.
- Intervention effect Intercropping reduced soybean seed yield by 38.34 per cent at 1:2 ratio.
- Intervention effect The 1:2 maize-soybean ratio gave higher maize grain equivalent productivity of 6182 kg ha−1.
- Intervention effect The 1:2 maize-soybean ratio gave higher LER of 1.47.
- Intervention effect Applying 50 kg ZnSO4 ha−1 gave significantly higher maize grain yield of 5301 kg ha1.
- Intervention effect Applying 50 kg ZnSO4 ha−1 gave significantly higher soybean grain yield of 936 kg ha−1.
- Intervention effect Applying 50 kg ZnSO4 ha−1 gave significantly higher maize-equivalent yield of 6850 kg ha−1.
- Intervention effect Sole crops had significantly higher N, P2O5, and K2O uptake than intercrops.
- Intervention effect Zinc treatments did not significantly vary N, P2O5, and K2O uptake by maize and soybean.
- Observation Soil P2O5 and K2O status declined after harvest across cropping systems and zinc levels.
- Observation Soil zinc status increased after harvest.
- Observation Soil N was enriched under intercropping.