Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 1:2 maize-soybean ratio gave higher maize grain equivalent productivity of 6182 kg ha−1.

A claim from Influence of row ratio and zinc levels on yield, nutrient uptake and soil fertility status of maize (zea mays l.) – soybean (glycine max l.) Intercropping systems under rainfed conditions · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1:2 maize-soybean ratio gave higher maize grain equivalent productivity of 6182 kg ha−1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
maize + soybean 1:2 ratioe0
Outcome
maize grain equivalente0
Direction
highere0
Value
6182 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total productivity of systems in terms of maize grain equivalent and LER (6182 kg ha−1 and 1.47) was found to be higher with maize + soybean 1:2 ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–747

Title

Influence of row ratio and zinc levels on yield, nutrient uptake and soil fertility status of maize (zea mays l.) – soybean (glycine max l.) Intercropping systems under rainfed conditions

Malve Sachin Himmatrao; R. Raghavaiah; Kadasiddappa Malamasuri; et al. Journal of progressive agriculture 2014

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e7bbff4ee920639c5c22022021ca91b061c763aafcb83cd99178fb01d68765a5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Glycine max · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.