Claim · model-written summary
Later sowing reduced CGR through R2–R5.
- Taxon
- Soybeans
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- delay in SDe1
- Outcome
- CGRe0
- Direction
- reductionse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with subsequent reductions in CGR and NAR through R2–R5 (beginning of grain filling)”
t0“Soybeans”
e1“with each 15-day delay in SD.”
Title
Soon-Suk Han; Hyun-Jin Park; Taehwan Shin; et al. Agronomy 2022. doi:10.3390/agronomy12081901
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Each 15-day sowing delay accelerated R2 flowering by 5 days.
- Intervention effect Later sowing significantly reduced vegetative growth through R2.
- Intervention effect Later sowing reduced NAR through R2–R5.
- Intervention effect A 30-day sowing delay significantly reduced yield by 27.0%.
- Intervention effect Rotary tillage yielded 13.7% more than deep plowing followed by rotary tillage.
- Association Soybean yield varied among years with weather volatility from 123.8 to 552.0 g m−2.
- Association Weather volatility contributed 30.4% of yield variability.
- Association SD contributed 17.0% of yield variability.
- Association TS contributed 10.3% of yield variability.
- Association The authors suggest yield is mainly determined by growth achieved before flowering and through R2–R5.