Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Irrigation schedules made little difference to wheat growth and yield under well-distributed rainfall.

A claim from Effect of sowing date, cultivars and irrigation scheduling on physiological parameters of wheat (Triticum aestivum) with climate change adaptation in perspective · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation schedules made little difference to wheat growth and yield under well-distributed rainfall.

Treatment
irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
growth and yield of crope0
Direction
did not make much differencee0
Qualifier
well-distributed rainfalle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Because of well-distributed rainfall, the irrigation treatments did not make much difference in the growth and yield of crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1331
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–231

Title

Effect of sowing date, cultivars and irrigation scheduling on physiological parameters of wheat (Triticum aestivum) with climate change adaptation in perspective

Rachana Dubey; H Pathak; M Pal; et al. Current Advances in Agricultural Sciences(An International Journal) 2016. doi:10.5958/2394-4471.2016.00033.2

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-cdf1922cd1fed5fa645776d248ceeee69e13af442dc9468bb3ca798c8aad045f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this claim · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.