Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Normal irrigation gave the highest wheat yield of 5.59 t ha-1, identical to skipped flowering and heading irrigation with 0.06% foliar zinc.

A claim from Effect of foliar application of zinc on yield of wheat grown by avoiding irrigation at different growth stages · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal irrigation gave the highest wheat yield of 5.59 t ha-1, identical to skipped flowering and heading irrigation with 0.06% foliar zinc.

Treatment
normal irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.59 t ha-1e0
Comparator
skipping irrigation at flowering and heading stage with 0.06% foliar application of zince0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest yield (5.59 t ha-1) was recorded in normal irrigation which was identical with skipping irrigation at flowering and heading stage with 0.06% foliar application of zinc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–1007
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–54

Title

Effect of foliar application of zinc on yield of wheat grown by avoiding irrigation at different growth stages

S Sultana; HM Naser; NC Shil; et al. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 2016. doi:10.3329/bjar.v41i2.28234

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-cebf0f8d602bf02b93fbb66f917fa6f24eb989caee7fd0c979f3a7056e34ffd6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.