Claim · model-written summary
Water stress benefited fruit growth in the post-stress period.
- Taxon
- peach trees
Prunus persicat0 - Treatment
- water stresse0
- Outcome
- fruit growthe0
- Direction
- benefitse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“‘Merrill Sundance’ peach trees”
e0“After-effects on limb expansion growth and benefits of water stress on fruit growth were obvious during the post-stress period”
Title
S.-H. Li; J.-G. Huguet; P. G. Schoch; et al. Journal of Horticultural Science 1989. doi:10.1080/14620316.1989.11515989
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Early rapid-growth water deficit increased harvest fruit size in two years.
- Intervention effect Final rapid-growth deficit produced smaller fruit.
- Intervention effect Deficit throughout fruit development produced smaller fruit.
- Intervention effect Pit-hardening water deficit did not affect fruit size.
- Intervention effect Water deficit during the first two fruit-development phases did not affect fruit size.
- Intervention effect Restricted water limited shoot extension growth.
- Intervention effect Restricted water limited limb diameter increase.
- Intervention effect Water stress had after-effects on limb expansion growth during post-stress period.
- Intervention effect All water stress treatments reduced premature fruit drop after June-drop.
- Intervention effect Final rapid-phase water stress raised fruit total soluble solids.
- Intervention effect Restricted water during flower bud induction improved flower bud production.